Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2901 - 2920 of 3786
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands
RUTTEN v. the Netherlands NLD 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to render the decision to prolong the applicant s confinement to a secure institution within the time limit provided for by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4477
RYABOV v. Russia
RYABOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Interference with the exercise of the applicant s right of individual petition through the police inquiry initiated against his lawyer violation of Art. 34 . Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13789
RYABYKH v. Russia
RYABYKH v. Russia RUS 03/12/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of final judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14074
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia
RYAKIB BIRYUKOV v. Russia RUS 07/07/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of public access to the reasoning of judicial decisions in civil and criminal matters between 2001 and 2009 as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13659
RYBACKI v. Poland
RYBACKI v. Poland POL 13/04/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of detention on remand as the grounds for prolonging detention were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17989
RYSER v. Switzerland
RYSER v. Switzerland CHE 12/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment and disproportionate interference on account of the applicant s obligation to pay a tax for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57577
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine
RYSOVSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns an unlawful and disproportionate interference with the applicant s property rights because of the impossibility to obtain in kind the plot of land granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31598
S.A. v. Portugal
S.A. v. Portugal PRT 27/10/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9405
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.B.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/09/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Automatic pre trial detention under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 and the lack of availability of an enforceable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2568
S.B. v. Romania
S.B. v. Romania ROU 23/12/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:23:17 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of opportunity to establish whether the applicant s dental treatment had constituted medical negligence and to obtain appropriate redress as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14219
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. ANTARES TRANSPORT S.A. AND S.C. TRANSROBY S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 15/03/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns the withdrawal in 2006 without compensation of six licences to operate public transport services on a group of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13113
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. BRITANIC WORLD S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 12/09/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty on account of the revision of a final county court judgment by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12718
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania
S.C. CONTINENTAL HOTELS S.A. v. Romania ROU 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions of the applicant a privatised company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52979
S.C. GRANITUL S.A. v. Romania
S.C. GRANITUL S.A. v. Romania ROU 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: De facto expropriation by the State of a piece of land without any compensation. Status of Execution: Just satisfaction paid. The judgment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16541
S.C. IMH SUCEAVA S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. IMH SUCEAVA S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 29/01/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial: Different decisions without sufficient reasons by two domestic courts as to the validity and reliability of the same piece of evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17552
S.C. POLYINVEST S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. Romania
S.C. POLYINVEST S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 29/03/2018 00:00:00 04/04/2018 15:18:40 Case Description: This judgment concerns three applications examined by the European Court under its well established case law procedure of which two brought by S.C. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49305
S.C. RAISA M. SHIPPING. S.R.L. v. Romania
S.C. RAISA M. SHIPPING. S.R.L. v. Romania ROU 08/07/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the lack of sufficient diligence of the competent court to ensure that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13425
S.C. TEXTINC S.A. v. Romania
S.C. TEXTINC S.A. v. Romania ROU 06/02/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the principle of legal certainty due to the quashing of a final domestic decision in favour of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48855
S.C. UZINEXPORT S.A. v. Romania
S.C. UZINEXPORT S.A. v. Romania ROU 30/06/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal by the High Court of Cassation and Justice of a claim by a company seeking to obtain default interest EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17582