Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 881 - 900 of 1338
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPREA v. Romania
OPREA v. Romania ROU 10/03/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Unlawful detention: Arrest by the border police and custody based on a warrant for the execution of a prison sentence which had been imposed in absentia and later revoked on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17570
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
OREFICI v. Espagne
OREFICI v. Espagne ESP 16/09/1999 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand. Article 5 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: Just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3467
ORMANCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ORMANCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Lengthy judicial proceedings: excessive length of proceedings before administrative civil criminal labour land registry military and commercial and consumers courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5522
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OSMANYAN AND AMIRAGHYAN v. Armenia
OSMANYAN AND AMIRAGHYAN v. Armenia ARM 11/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference on account of the expropriation of land for mining without addressing the issue of whether the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51635
OSTACE v. Romania
OSTACE v. Romania ROU 25/05/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Inability to obtain the revision of a judgment establishing one s paternity in spite of an extra judicial forensic examination proving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13347
OVAL v. Belgium
OVAL v. Belgium BEL 15/02/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings in particular before the Brussels Court of Appeal Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1443
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
OYAL v. Turkey
OYAL v. Turkey TUR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Right to life / functioning of justice / protection of private life / effective remedy: Failure of authorities to protect the lives of the applicants or their next of kin on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37334
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
OZDIL AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: In the present case the Court found violations of Articles 5 1 and 8 of the Convention on account of the extra legal transfer of all five applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52803
OZLER v. Turkey
OZLER v. Turkey TUR 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Allegedly unjustified interference on account of criminal proceedings against the applicant under former Article 8 of the Law against terrorism. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26814
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey
OZMURAT INSAAT ELEKTRIK NAKLIYAT TEMIZLIK SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 28/05/2018 11:38:33 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Domestic courts refusal without any specific reasons of the applicant s request for a hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49543
P.S. v. Germany
P.S. v. Germany DEU 04/09/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the applicant s conviction for sexual abuse of a minor on the basis of the alleged victim s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38326
PAIS PIRES DE LIMA v. Portugal
PAIS PIRES DE LIMA v. Portugal PRT 12/05/2019 00:00:00 01/07/2019 15:02:08 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate and unnecessary interference due to the amount of compensation awarded in a civil judgment ordering a lawyer to pay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52353
PALMERO v. France
PALMERO v. France FRA 30/01/2015 00:00:00 17/10/2016 11:07:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings against the State under Article L. 781 of the Code of Judicial Organisation on behalf of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25
PALUDA v. Slovakia
PALUDA v. Slovakia SVK 23/08/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in disciplinary due to a judge s inability to obtain judicial review of his suspension from office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47683
PANETTA v. Italy
PANETTA v. Italy ITA 15/10/2014 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:20:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of national proceedings intended to provide assistance under the New York Convention of 1956 on the recovery of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45028
PANYIK v. Hungary
PANYIK v. Hungary HUN 12/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the applicant s legitimate doubt as to the impartiality of the tribunal as the judge in charge of the appeal had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10975