Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 2241 - 2260 of 2798
SARIDAS v. Turkey
SARIDAS v. Turkey TUR 07/10/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings before the Supreme Military Administrative Court to challenge a medical assessment concerning the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37400
SARL ABORCAS v. France
SARL ABORCAS v. France FRA 30/08/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Erroneous refusal of access to a court by the Court of Appeal and the Court of Cassation. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32717
SARL DU PARC D'ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM v. France
SARL DU PARC D ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM v. France FRA 11/10/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the presence of the Government Commissioner in the deliberations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32851
SARL LE CLUB AND OTHERS v. France
SARL LE CLUB AND OTHERS v. France FRA 20/07/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 11:28:25 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47971
SARNELLI v. Italy
SARNELLI v. Italy ITA 17/10/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to inadequate compensation awarded for the expropriation of land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44550
SARP KURAY v. Turkey
SARP KURAY v. Turkey TUR 24/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 14:32:01 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the impossibility for the applicants to examine the witnesses against them as well as excessive length of those EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34765
SARTORY v. France
SARTORY v. France FRA 01/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:09:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts regarding the applicant s transfer to a different post. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32489
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SATONNET v. France
SATONNET v. France FRA 02/08/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:01:23 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings concerning the applicant s dismissal as a civil servant. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31960
SAUNDERS v. the United Kingdom
SAUNDERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 17/12/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the use made by the prosecution of self incriminatory statements made under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2286
SAVATIN v. Romania
SAVATIN v. Romania ROU 13/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:48:18 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment suffered by the applicant in 2010 as a result of the conduct of the law enforcement officers substantive violation of Article 3 . Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45757
SAVIC v. Slovakia
SAVIC v. Slovakia SVK 24/09/1998 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of the applicant s detention on remand and excessive length of the related proceedings. Article 5 3 4 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7809
SAVINO v. Italy
SAVINO v. Italy ITA 28/07/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of independence and objective impartiality of the Chamber of Deputies Judicial Section competent to decide in last instance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28232
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Quashing of a final judgment in criminal proceedings under the supervisory review protest procedure. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26162
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVOTCHKO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to the disclosure of the applicant s telephone records provided by the national landline EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47385
SAVRAN v. Denmark
SAVRAN v. Denmark DNK 07/12/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The cases concern expulsion orders combined with permanent re entry bans following criminal convictions finally upheld during proceedings requesting revocation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59071
SAVU v. Romania
SAVU v. Romania ROU 04/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Quashing of final court decisions by the Supreme Court following an application for nullity lodged by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16755
SAVVIDES v. Cyprus
SAVVIDES v. Cyprus CYP 14/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Disproportionate hindrance in access to a court on account of the Family Court of Appeal s excessively formalistic refusal to examine the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59145
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244
SC MAROLUX SRL AND JACOBS v. Romania
SC MAROLUX SRL AND JACOBS v. Romania ROU 01/12/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to excessive court fees. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16351