Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
KHRYKIN v. Russia
KHRYKIN v. Russia RUS 19/07/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of a violation of the principle of legal certainty and objectively justified EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14012
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary HUN 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the asylum seeking applicants detention violations of Article 5 1 . In Lokpo and Tour Al Tayyar Abdelhakim and Said in 2009 and 2010 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10637
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to handcuffing during in patient treatment of a detainee on remand in a disproportionate manner not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32266
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 13/10/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2022 19:35:01 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference in 2011 and 2012 with the right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions of the applicants Todorov and Others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60335
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592