Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 18 of 18
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 28/10/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against detention lack of a remedy: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14265
CRISAN v. Romania
CRISAN v. Romania ROU 27/08/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to court due to the inability to challenge before a court the lawfulness of the decisions of an administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16071
ERBEK v. Turkey
ERBEK v. Turkey TUR 19/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Non communication of the public prosecutor s opinion to the applicants or their representative non appearance of the applicants before a court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49763
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant bank to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions on account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39457
ISILDAK v. Turkey
ISILDAK v. Turkey TUR 30/12/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:27:27 Case Description: The case concerns unjustified interference with the applicant s right to respect of his home on account of the search carried out in his workshop by police officers without a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37064
KAPETANIOS AND OTHERS v. Greece
KAPETANIOS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 14/09/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: This case concerns: Violations of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 right not to be tried or punished twice with regard to all three applicants on account of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15624
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the State Border Guard Service to allow the applicants to submit asylum applications at border check points and their return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51869
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 25/03/1999 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and impossibility of challenging the lawfulness of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14277
PATOUX v. France
PATOUX v. France FRA 14/07/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to conduct a speedy review of the lawfulness of a detention as it took the civil judge 46 days to decide on the request for immediate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33289
PILAGS v. Latvia
PILAGS v. Latvia LVA 03/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: The present case concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial as the domestic courts did not properly examine the applicant s allegations of incitement in the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59813
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
RAVON AND OTHERS v. France
RAVON AND OTHERS v. France FRA 21/05/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to challenge the lawfulness of the house searches and seizures to which they had been subjected in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33031
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
SHAMAYEV AND 12 OTHERS v. Georgia and Russia
SHAMAYEV AND 12 OTHERS v. Georgia and Russia GEO RUS 12/10/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: The case concerns a certain number of violations found in relation to the detention and extradition by Georgia to Russian Federation of thirteen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5808