Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 149
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
L.M. v. Slovenia
L.M. v. Slovenia SVN 12/09/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful involuntary confinement in the closed wards of the Idrija and Ljubljana Psychiatric Hospitals and the open ward EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7414
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal PRT 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of two lawyers for defamation L.P. and for attacking a person s honour Carvalho in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52983
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The Lashmankin group mainly concerns violations of the right to freedom of assembly in different Russian cities between 2003 and 2018 violations of Article 11 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47097
LAVENTS v. Latvia
LAVENTS v. Latvia LVA 28/02/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice protection of private life and correspondence: Unfair criminal proceedings due to unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31170
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LJATIFI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
LJATIFI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 08/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Safeguards in expulsion proceedings: Failure to provide the minimum safeguards in asylum proceedings due to the lack of meaningful judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50675
LUCIC v. Croatia
LUCIC v. Croatia HRV 27/05/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability for the applicants to examine key witnesses whose statements were of decisive importance for their convictions in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10301
M.S.S. v. Belgium
M.S.S. v. Belgium BEL 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41571
M.S.S. v. Greece
M.S.S. v. Greece GRC 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1219
MALEK v. Austria
MALEK v. Austria AUT 12/09/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of disciplinary proceedings against lawyers Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-969
MAMMADOV (JALALOGLU) v. Azerbaijan
MAMMADOV JALALOGLU v. Azerbaijan AZE 11/04/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1759
MARINOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
MARINOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: These cases concern the disproportionate interference with the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions in criminal proceedings between 2004 and 2011 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39477
MEDICI AND OTHERS v. Italy
MEDICI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 05/01/2007 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:05:47 Case Description: Recourse to indirect expropriation a practice of emergency occupation of land by local administrative authorities without any formal expropriation procedure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44997
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 28/11/2017 00:00:00 13/12/2017 10:54:38 Case Description: The case concerns violations suffered by the applicant a former Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of Georgia during his pre trial detention in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48437
MERCUR SYSTEM A.D. AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
MERCUR SYSTEM A.D. AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 26/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56303
MGN LIMITED v. the United Kingdom
MGN LIMITED v. the United Kingdom GBR 18/04/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant publishing company s obligation as a defendant in domestic privacy proceedings it had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2208
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 17/03/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These groups of cases concern mainly the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin or their ill treatment allegedly imputable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1711