Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 119
NOLAN AND K. v. Russia
NOLAN AND K. v. Russia RUS 06/07/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns numerous violations of the Convention linked to the first applicant s expulsion in 2002 from the Russian Federation: The first applicant a U.S. citizen EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13785
NUNEZ v. Norway
NUNEZ v. Norway NOR 28/09/2011 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of family life expulsion : Interference in the event of a mother s expulsion entailing the separation from her children born and living in Norway. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-217
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerned the impossibility for the applicants fifty one Bulgarian nationals of Roma 1 ethnic origin to enjoy their private and family life and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62534
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PFEIFER v. Bulgaria
PFEIFER v. Bulgaria BGR 17/05/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Restriction of freedom of movement by travel ban pending criminal proceedings: Failure by authorities to justify throughout the whole duration of the travel ban the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14421
PLOSKI v. Poland
PLOSKI v. Poland POL 12/02/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to grant detainees leave to attend their parents funerals. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17761
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
POPOV v. Russia
POPOV v. Russia RUS 11/12/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the lack of medical assistance provided to detainees suffering from grave acute or chronic health conditions both in pre trial detention centres and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14118
ROSENGREN v. Romania
ROSENGREN v. Romania ROU 24/07/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful or disproportionate prohibition to leave the country or the city in the framework of criminal proceedings. Article 2 2 of Protocol No. 4 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16151
ROSTOVTSEV v. Ukraine
ROSTOVTSEV v. Ukraine UKR 25/10/2017 00:00:00 08/11/2017 09:27:12 Case Description: Right to appeal in criminal matters: Refusal owing to the unforeseeable application of certain rules of criminal procedure of the applicant s request for leave to appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48169
S.H. v. the United Kingdom
S.H. v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/09/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/expulsion: Risk for a Bhutanese national of ethnic Nepalese origin to be subjected to torture or degrading or inhuman treatment in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3005
SAMOKHVALOV v. Russia
SAMOKHVALOV v. Russia RUS 12/05/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violations of the applicants right to a fair trial and of the principle of equality of arms on account of the appeal courts examination of their criminal cases in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13709
SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Automatic ban to leave the country on the ground of a lacking rehabilitation fallowing a criminal conviction. The bans remained in force not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14471
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
SASO GORGIEV v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 19/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Right to life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant against a uniformed police reservist who on unauthorised leave of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6660
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine
SAVINSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Quashing of a final judgment in criminal proceedings under the supervisory review protest procedure. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26162
SCHEMKAMPER v. France
SCHEMKAMPER v. France FRA 18/01/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability of a convict to challenge a decision of the judge responsible for the execution of sentences who rejected his request for temporary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33247
SCHOLZ AG v. Armenia
SCHOLZ AG v. Armenia ARM 24/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:55:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified and disproportionate limitation of access to court due to the domestic courts failure to examine the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51369
SHALIMOV v. Ukraine
SHALIMOV v. Ukraine UKR 04/06/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life because of the authorities refusals to allow family visits during their detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31108
SINAN ISIK v. Turkey
SINAN ISIK v. Turkey TUR 02/05/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Freedom of thought conscience and religion: Disproportionate interference due to obligation to disclose one s belief through the mandatory indication of religion on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37178
SISSANIS v. Romania
SISSANIS v. Romania ROU 25/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful or disproportionate prohibition to leave the country or the city in the framework of criminal proceedings. Article 2 2 of Protocol No. 4 Access EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16331