Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1101 - 1120 of 1429
QUEMAR v. France
QUEMAR v. France FRA 01/05/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in which the applicants were either accused or civil parties and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32711
QUILES GONZALEZ v. Spain
QUILES GONZALEZ v. Spain ESP 27/07/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of proceedings before labour courts and the Constitutional Tribunal. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3501
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
R.S. v. Poland
R.S. v. Poland POL 21/10/2015 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection of family life: Domestic court s failure in return proceedings under the Hague Convention concerning his children abducted by their mother to consider parental rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39937
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
RADANOVIC v. Croatia
RADANOVIC v. Croatia HRV 21/03/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to repossess property for a prolonged period of time as a result of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10079
RADULESCU v. Romania
RADULESCU v. Romania ROU 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction by the a court of appeal in 2012 without a renewed hearing of the witnesses although the first instance court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55185
RAFAILOVIC v. Serbia
RAFAILOVIC v. Serbia SRB 16/09/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to access to a court on account of non enforcement of final court decisions concerning debts of socially owned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6997
RAFFI v. France
RAFFI v. France FRA 13/09/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy/ Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32871
RAGUZ v. Croatia
RAGUZ v. Croatia HRV 10/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice / right to marry: Excessive length of civil including divorce and paternity proceedings and interference with the right to marry EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10081
RAHIMOVA v. Azerbaijan
RAHIMOVA v. Azerbaijan AZE 07/07/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive length of certain civil proceedings violation of Article 6 1 . The Court held that significant unjustified period of inactivity before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1816
RAJIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
RAJIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 05/09/2017 00:00:00 02/10/2017 14:27:00 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47757
RAMAZANOGLU v. Turkey
RAMAZANOGLU v. Turkey TUR 10/09/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings before a matial law court. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28867
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria AUT 28/04/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Excessive length of civil and criminal administrative proceedings and lack of effective remedy thereof Status of Execution: The Austrian administrative court system has EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1109
RAMISHVILI v. Georgia
RAMISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 31/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: Electoral rights: General and automatic ban in the parliamentary elections 2008 on all prisoners convicted of a crime irrespective of the length of the sentence and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49609
RANDELOVIC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
RANDELOVIC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 19/12/2017 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of effective investigations into the disappearance of the applicant s two family members following a boat accident due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48621
RAZA v. Bulgaria
RAZA v. Bulgaria BGR 11/05/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention pending expulsion and deportation and of family life: Shortcomings of the judicial review in respect of foreign nationals expulsion on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1928
REAL ALVES v. Portugal
REAL ALVES v. Portugal PRT 07/06/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9633
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/11/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59085
REFIK KARAKOC v. Turkey
REFIK KARAKOC v. Turkey TUR 10/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference with the applicants freedom of expression due to their conviction under former Anti terrorism Law and/or seizure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30234