Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 101 - 120 of 145
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
POPOV v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 06/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concern the violation of the applicants right to a fair hearing on account of the quashing of domestic final judgments between 2004 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6810
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland
RECZKOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/11/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59085
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
ROMANOWSKI v. Poland
ROMANOWSKI v. Poland POL 12/01/2023 00:00:00 20/01/2023 18:00:32 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate infringement of the applicant s right to private life due to the failure to strike a fair balance between his rights and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62384
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SAKHNOVSKIY v. Russia
SAKHNOVSKIY v. Russia RUS 02/11/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of failures to properly organise criminal proceedings conducted by video EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13759
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SAMOKHVALOV v. Russia
SAMOKHVALOV v. Russia RUS 12/05/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violations of the applicants right to a fair trial and of the principle of equality of arms on account of the appeal courts examination of their criminal cases in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13709
SANTANDREA v. Italy
SANTANDREA v. Italy ITA 12/04/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness of the applicants detention for approximately 30 hours after the judge competent for the preliminary investigation had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45112
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia
SANTARE AND LABAZNIKOVS v. Latvia LVA 30/06/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to covert interception in of telephone conversations in the framework of the criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12674
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 26/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the hindrance by the authorities of the effective exercise by the applicant of his right of petition to the Court by failing to provide him with copies of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31622
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SEVERE v. Austria
SEVERE v. Austria AUT 21/12/2017 00:00:00 09/02/2018 11:08:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48763
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SHKIRYA v. Ukraine
SHKIRYA v. Ukraine UKR 24/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns a breach of the applicant s right of access to a court as the domestic courts failed to examine his additional claim of 16 February 2009 related to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57921
SIRYK v. Ukraine
SIRYK v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to defamation proceedings brought against the applicant following a letter she addressed to the tax authorities in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32056
SKALKA v. Poland
SKALKA v. Poland POL 27/08/2003 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction and further term of imprisonment of a detainee for insulting a State authority having written a letter to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17929
STRIZHAK v. Ukraine
STRIZHAK v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the domestic authorities failure to inform the applicant duly of the date and time of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26158