Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17
A. v. Norway
A. v. Norway NOR 09/07/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private life: Domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation due to the unfavourable outcome of a defamation suit that he brought against a newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-205
BUTT v. Norway
BUTT v. Norway NOR 04/03/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Interference with family and private life in case of deportation to Pakistan Status of Execution: Immigration Appeals Board granted permanent residence in 2012. One of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-213
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
F.Z. v. Norway
F.Z. v. Norway NOR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to shortcomings in the public child welfare authorities and courts decision making processes concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58033
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 29/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Right to education: Refusal to grant full exemption from instruction in Christianity religion and philosophy in State primary schools right Article 2 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-187
JANSEN v. Norway
JANSEN v. Norway NOR 06/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decision to deprive the applicant of contact with her child who was in foster care EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51027
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway
K.O. AND V.M. v. Norway NOR 15/04/2020 00:00:00 29/04/2020 09:24:01 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decisions to only allow the applicants contact with their child four or six EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55133
KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. Norway
KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 24/10/2014 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Expulsion of a family father to Turkey with a five year re entry ban. Status of Execution: Just satisfaction paid. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-221
N. v. Romania (no. 2)
N. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 16/02/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental health conditions substantive violation of Article 2 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59831
NUNEZ v. Norway
NUNEZ v. Norway NOR 28/09/2011 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of family life expulsion : Interference in the event of a mother s expulsion entailing the separation from her children born and living in Norway. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-217
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
PEDERSEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 07/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the biological parents right to family life due to shortcomings in the balancing exercise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55909
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. Norway
SANCHEZ CARDENAS v. Norway NOR 04/01/2008 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate und unjustified interference due to suspicions expressed in a court decision on the applicant s visiting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-189
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 10/09/2019 00:00:00 22/10/2019 16:32:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns breaches of biological parents rights to family life due to decisions taken between 2011 and 2019 in the public child welfare EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54045
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
VILNES AND OTHERS v. Norway
VILNES AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 24/03/2014 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Failure by the State to fulfil the positive obligation to respect for family life by ensuring that the applicants divers engaged in diving operations in the North EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-215