Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 322
RYABYKH v. Russia
RYABYKH v. Russia RUS 03/12/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: infringement of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing of final judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14074
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKAR AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 20/01/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment on account of lack of sufficient personal space in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37294
SAKIK & OTHERS v. Turkey
SAKIK OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/11/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention due to the authorities failure to present the applicants promptly and automatically before a judge and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5470
SANADER v. Croatia
SANADER v. Croatia HRV 06/07/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair trial on account of the fact that the domestic courts did not grant the applicant the reopening of criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10149
SARANOVIC v. Montenegro
SARANOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 07/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified detention as the extension order of the applicants pre trial detention was issued after the statutory time limit having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54077
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine
SAVITSKYY v. Ukraine UKR 26/10/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the hindrance by the authorities of the effective exercise by the applicant of his right of petition to the Court by failing to provide him with copies of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31622
SCHONBROD v. Germany
SCHONBROD v. Germany DEU 24/02/2012 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:24:56 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary and thus unlawful preventive detention due to the domestic courts failure to comply with the requirement for a speedy EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38208
SEGERSTEDT-WIBERG AND OTHERS v. Sweden
SEGERSTEDT WIBERG AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 06/09/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection of private life freedom of expression and association and lack of domestic remedy: Unjustified storage by the Security Service of information EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2144
SEJDOVIC v. Italy
SEJDOVIC v. Italy ITA 01/03/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:48:42 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings sentencing in absentia to several years imprisonment although it had not been shown that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45170
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey (no. 2)
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 22/12/2020 00:00:00 18/01/2021 11:11:14 Case Description: The Selahattin Demirta No. 2 case concerns the arrest and pre trial detention of and criminal proceedings against the applicant a member of the National EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56539
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine
SERGEY VOLOSYUK v. Ukraine UKR 12/06/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the unlawful interference with the applicants right to respect for their correspondence with various official bodies and institutions both while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31112
SERYAVIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
SERYAVIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference in that the authorities first contrary to domestic legislation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31586
SHAMSA v. Poland
SHAMSA v. Poland POL 27/02/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of a legal basis for the applicants Libyan nationals detention in the transit zone at Warsaw airport beyond the statutory time limit. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17981
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
SHVETS v. Ukraine
SHVETS v. Ukraine UKR 23/07/2019 00:00:00 23/07/2019 17:45:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the authorities failure to enforce domestic judgments relating to granting custody or access rights to minor children between 2009 2021 violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52615
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece
SIDIROPOULOS AND PAPAKOSTAS v. Greece GRC 25/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: These cases concern ill treatment by law enforcement agents substantive violation of Article 3 in Konstantinopoulos and Others No. 2 and the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49397
SIMECKI v. Croatia
SIMECKI v. Croatia HRV 30/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Denial of access to a court in enforcement proceedings: due to the enforcement order having never been served on the applicant and her subsequent arguments before the courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12351
SIMSEK v. Turkey
SIMSEK v. Turkey TUR 30/07/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Prolonged detention without any judicial review and impossibility to challenge speedily the lawfulness of the applicant s detention as he had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28579