Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 104
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia RUS 29/06/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty through quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27544
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 13/06/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of the applicant company s right to a fair hearing and infringement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6868
B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Slovenia
B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Slovenia SVN 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful and disproportionate interference due to the confiscation of a transport company s lorry in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46761
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BASENKO v. Ukraine
BASENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/02/2016 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and effective remedy: Ill treatment of the applicants by State agents a public transport employee and two volunteer citizen guards and lack EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32270
BASU v. Germany
BASU v. Germany DEU 18/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to ascertain through an independent body that an effective investigation is carried out by the State authorities into the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62530
BAYRAK v. Turkey
BAYRAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lack of independence of military disciplinary courts which ordered a lengthy deprivation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37266
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey
BIL INSAAT TAAHHUT TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 01/01/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the demolition of the applicant company s construction work on an expropriated site EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37158
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria
BOYADZHIEVA AND GLORIA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED EOOD v. Bulgaria BGR 05/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Protection of property: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to the automatic order to return payments the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50539
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom
BOYLE v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/04/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Detention decided in the Army by the Commanding Officer who does not present EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2674
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985