Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
B. v. Romania (no. 2)
B. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 19/05/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of adequate legal protection of the applicant on the occasion of her psychiatric confinements as from 2000 and during proceedings which led to maintaining the measure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13089
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine UKR 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The group of cases concerns the disproportionate refusal of the authorities at different periods between 2005 2014 to provide an NGO and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55745
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. Russia
JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 21/10/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of Article 38 on account of the failure to submit to the European Court a copy of the decision of the Chief Military Prosecutor s Office adopted on 21 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14002
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAT ALIYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 08/07/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This group of 25 cases concerns violations of the right to free elections Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of members of opposition parties or independent candidates in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1773
O'KEEFFE v. Ireland
O KEEFFE v. Ireland IRL 28/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 16:50:41 Case Description: The case concerns the responsibility of the Irish State for the sexual abuse of the applicant aged nine by a lay teacher LH in a National School in 1973. A prior complaint EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1946
TAVLI v. Turkey
TAVLI v. Turkey TUR 09/02/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Impossibility for the applicant to prevail himself before the national courts of DNA tests proving that he was not the father of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5574