Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 115
PRIGALA v. the Republic of Moldova
PRIGALA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/02/2018 00:00:00 16/02/2018 14:47:48 Case Description: No punishment without law: Imposition of a fine on a notary for wrong calculation and payment of social insurance contributions despite contradictions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48931
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania
R.I. AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: Cases: R.I. and Others v. Romania application no. 57077/16 judgment final on 4 December 2018 Olindraru v. Romania application no. 1490/17 judgment final on 19 March EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50931
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine
RUDNICHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 11/10/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: Right to liberty functioning of justice: Unlawful administrative detention without a court order and excessively lengthy detention on remand unfair criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33465
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SCHNEIDER v. Luxemburg
SCHNEIDER v. Luxemburg LUX 10/10/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of association and protection of property: Interference with the right to freedom of association as according to a law of 1925 the applicant was forced to enroll EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-133
SHANNON v. Latvia
SHANNON v. Latvia LVA 24/02/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure by a regional court to examine promptly appeals against the extension of remand in custody. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31183
SICA v. Romania
SICA v. Romania ROU 09/10/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: impossibility in criminal proceedings to examine or have examined in court witnesses for the prosecution whose statements before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13272
SINAN ISIK v. Turkey
SINAN ISIK v. Turkey TUR 02/05/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: Freedom of thought conscience and religion: Disproportionate interference due to obligation to disclose one s belief through the mandatory indication of religion on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37178
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
SOCIETE ANONYME THALEIA KARYDI AXTE v. Greece
SOCIETE ANONYME THALEIA KARYDI AXTE v. Greece GRC 10/05/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Inability to effectively challenge the mandatory sale of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15601
STAFFORD v. the United Kingdom
STAFFORD v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Continued detention of prisoners sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment after the expiry of their tariffs without review of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2618
STANEV v. Bulgaria
STANEV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/01/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: This case concerns the placement of the applicant subject to a partial guardianship order following a diagnosis of schizophrenia in a social care home. The Court found that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3767
STANIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria
STANIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Lack of public hearing: Impossibility for the applicant to appear and defend the case either in person or through a lawyer before administrative courts Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14629
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia
STANIMIROVIC v. Serbia SRB 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the ineffective investigations into the allegations of ill treatment by police officers procedural violations of Article 3 ill treatment by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7310
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a remedy to challenge one s placement in security cells which had a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9695
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
T. v. the United Kingdom
T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/1999 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Denial of a fair trial due to the applicants inability minors aged 10 at the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2452
TALPIS v. Italy
TALPIS v. Italy ITA 18/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: This group of cases notably concerns violations of Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention because of the inertia of the authorities in handling the applicants complaints of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47825