Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 29
CATT v. the United Kingdom
CATT v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/04/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: The case concerns the retention from 2005 till present of personal data of a lifelong peace activist born in 1925 on a police database. The data included information EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52207
CERNAK v. Slovakia
CERNAK v. Slovakia SVK 14/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: failure to guarantee adequate review of lawfulness of detention as the applicant s representatives had limited possibilities to consult the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7705
DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 01/10/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns ill treatment of the applicants serving their sentences in high security Zamkova Prison Zhytomyr Region suffered in the course of training EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31328
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The cases mainly concern the deaths of the applicants next of kin as a result of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37076
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GLASS v. the United Kingdom
GLASS v. the United Kingdom GBR 09/06/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the administration of medical treatment to a child with mental and physical disabilities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2680
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
GUBACSI v. Hungary
GUBACSI v. Hungary HUN 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns ill treatment between 2000 and 2016 by law enforcement officers during the applicants arrest transfer and detention and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10515
HAMIDOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
HAMIDOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Punishment for contempt of court of a witness belonging to the Wahhabi/Salafi version of Islam in a criminal trial for refusing to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49191
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland
LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. Switzerland CHE 09/02/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and discrimination: Discrimination with regard to a binational couple s choice of surname. Article 14 in conjunction with 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4744
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
PREZEC v. Croatia
PREZEC v. Croatia HRV 15/01/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to grant the accused free legal assistance at the trial stage in criminal proceedings and failure of the counsel EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12319
R.R. v. Italy
R.R. v. Italy ITA 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction in absentia without the applicant being given any opportunity to defend himself in person and to set out his version of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44483
RECHTOVA v. the Czech Republic
RECHTOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/09/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to Constitutional Court due to its restrictive interpretation of the admissibility rules. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6392
REGALOVA v. the Czech Republic
REGALOVA v. the Czech Republic CZE 03/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to Constitutional Court due to its restrictive interpretation of the admissibility rules. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6314
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459