Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 3661 - 3680 of 5079
PLUMEY v. Switzerland
PLUMEY v. Switzerland CHE 14/08/1997 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Detention on remand ordered by the Public Prosecutor who did not have the quality of a judge or other officer authorised by law to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4650
POBORNIKOFF v. Austria
POBORNIKOFF v. Austria AUT 03/10/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a public hearing on appeal. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-817
POCUCA v. Croatia
POCUCA v. Croatia HRV 29/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of effective remedy: Excessive length of pension proceedings before administrative authorities and courts as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10351
PODKOLZINA v. Latvia
PODKOLZINA v. Latvia LVA 09/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Electoral rights: Infringement due to the striking off the list of candidates for parliamentary elections in 1998 of a citizen belonging to the Russian speaking minority on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31162
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POGORYELOV v. Ukraine
POGORYELOV v. Ukraine UKR 13/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: The case concerns the two day arbitrary psychiatric detention of the applicant in 2014 who suffered from alleged mental health issues without any reasonable indication of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61469
POIROT v. France
POIROT v. France FRA 15/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Dismissal of a civil party s appeal against the investigating judge s order to send a case concerning her allegation of sexual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33071
POITRIMOL v. France
POITRIMOL v. France FRA 23/11/1993 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court and thus of a fair trial on account of the declaration of inadmissibility ipso jure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32907
POKORNY v. Austria
POKORNY v. Austria AUT 16/12/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-555
POLAT v. Austria
POLAT v. Austria AUT 20/10/2021 00:00:00 05/11/2021 13:57:21 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference on account of the postmortem examination of the applicant s baby carried out against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58807
POLAT v. Turkey
POLAT v. Turkey TUR 07/05/2019 00:00:00 10/05/2019 11:28:52 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to the criminal proceedings initiated against the applicants under various articles of the Criminal Code of Anti Terrorism EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51979
POLAT v. Turkey
POLAT v. Turkey TUR 05/12/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28699
POLESHCHUK v. Russia
POLESHCHUK v. Russia RUS 07/01/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Interference due to the refusal by penitentiary authorities to forward the applicant s letters to the ECtHR. Article 34 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27518
POLIDARIO v. Switzerland
POLIDARIO v. Switzerland CHE 30/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to take appropriate measures to preserve the relationship between a Philippines mother and her child abducted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5874
POLITICAL PARTY "PATRIA" AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
POLITICAL PARTY PATRIA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: Electoral rights: Arbitrary interference with the applicants and the applicant party s electoral rights as a result of the latter s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56335
POLIZZI v. Italy
POLIZZI v. Italy ITA 12/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of labour court proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42455
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants right to respect for their private and family life which has been violated as a result of lustration violation of the Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54941
PONCELET v. Belgium
PONCELET v. Belgium BEL 04/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the prosecution of senior civil servant on basis of reports compiled during an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1531