Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 4701 - 4720 of 5079
V. v. Finland
V. v. Finland FIN 24/07/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings where the applicant was unable to argue that he had been incited by the police to commit a drug offence because the police authorities failed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5960
VACCARO v. Italy
VACCARO v. Italy ITA 16/02/2001 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive length of detention on remand without justifying reasons and failure of authorities to act with due expedition during preliminary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43517
VAIVADA v. Lithuania
VAIVADA v. Lithuania LTU 26/03/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention and inability to contest the lawfulness of detention due to the statutory bar under the former Code of Criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4203
VAJAGIC v. Croatia
VAJAGIC v. Croatia HRV 11/12/2006 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure of the authorities to decide on the amount of compensation for the expropriation in 1976 of certain properties due to delays caused by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12473
VAJNAI v. Hungary
VAJNAI v. Hungary HUN 08/10/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to the applicants criminal convictions on the basis of a prohibition of the use of totalitarian EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10507
VALANT v. Slovenia
VALANT v. Slovenia SVN 24/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Protection of property: Interference with property rights on account of a seizure of the applicant s car in criminal proceedings based on an unlawful search warrant. Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47173
VALASINAS v. Lithuania
VALASINAS v. Lithuania LTU 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Inhuman treatment with regard to a body search and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4179
VALDHUTER v. Romania
VALDHUTER v. Romania ROU 27/09/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the inability to question a witness whose statements had been taken into account for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47943
VALENTINO ACATRINEI v. Romania
VALENTINO ACATRINEI v. Romania ROU 25/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:04:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life as well as correspondence: absence of sufficient legislative safeguards as regards the interception of telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14208
VALENTYN IVANOV v. Ukraine
VALENTYN IVANOV v. Ukraine UKR 25/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57095
VALIULIENE v. Lithuania
VALIULIENE v. Lithuania LTU 26/06/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure of the domestic authorities to provide adequate protection against acts of domestic violence and discontinuation of criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4343
VALLAR v. France
VALLAR v. France FRA 19/06/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:09:01 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before labour courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32361
VALLE v. Finlande
VALLE v. Finlande FIN 07/12/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence and lack of a remedy: Unlawful interference due to the restriction of the applicant s phone calls to his counsel during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4804
VALOVA, SLEZAK AND SLEZAK v. Slovakia
VALOVA SLEZAK AND SLEZAK v. Slovakia SVK 01/09/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the administrative authorities decision to reopen proceedings which had led to the recognition of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7857
VALSAMIS v. Greece
VALSAMIS v. Greece GRC 18/12/1996 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion and right to education: Disproportionate interference due to a pupil a Jehovah s witness suspension from school who had refused because of her pacifist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22134
VAMVAKAS v. Greece
VAMVAKAS v. Greece GRC 16/01/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 17:31:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a tribunal due to the excessively formalistic rejection as inadmissible of the applicants appeals in criminal proceedings before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15774
VAMVAKAS v. Greece (n° 2)
VAMVAKAS v. Greece n 2 GRC 14/09/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the dismissal of the applicant s appeal on points of law owing to the unexplained absence of the court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15759
VAN BOERUM v. the Netherlands
VAN BOERUM v. the Netherlands NLD 31/10/1998 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4465
VAN DE KOLK v. the Netherlands
VAN DE KOLK v. the Netherlands NLD 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the authorities failure to allow the applicant a suspect of child pornography distribution to be EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52201
VAN GEYSEGHEM v. Belgium
VAN GEYSEGHEM v. Belgium BEL 21/01/1999 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to be defended by a lawyer of one s own choosing at different stages of criminal proceedings first EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1371