Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 81 - 100 of 127
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
PAKETOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/01/2023 00:00:00 03/02/2023 17:20:59 Case Description: The case concerned the impossibility for the applicants fifty one Bulgarian nationals of Roma 1 ethnic origin to enjoy their private and family life and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62534
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PECK v. the United Kingdom
PECK v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy: Disclosure in the media by a local council of an individual s photographs taken by a CCTV camera installed in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2236
PESA v. Croatia
PESA v. Croatia HRV 08/07/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and presumption of innocence: Unjustified detention and delayed decision on the constitutionality of detention and statements by public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12557
PETRENCO v. the Republic of Moldova
PETRENCO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation when assessing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6834
PETRINA v. Romania
PETRINA v. Romania ROU 06/04/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of domestic courts to adequately protect one s reputation in criminal proceedings for defamation and insult brought by the applicant a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16183
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 18/03/2013 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:37:05 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23422
PICHUGIN v. Russia
PICHUGIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: These cases 1 concern violations of the applicant s right to liberty and to a fair trial in the context of two sets of criminal proceedings which ended with his conviction on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47013
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania
R.D. AND I.M.D. v. Romania ROU 12/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58659
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 01/05/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of of the right to freedom of association on account of the authorities a unlawful de facto refusals to register the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1607
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA, A.S. v. Slovakia (no. 4)
RINGIER AXEL SPRINGER SLOVAKIA A.S. v. Slovakia no. 4 SVK 23/12/2021 00:00:00 27/01/2022 16:01:33 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate imposition of administrative fine in 2012 2015 on a multimedia publishing house by the Slovak EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59483
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg
ROEMEN AND SCHMIT v. Luxembourg LUX 25/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Searches conducted at the home and the workplace of a journalist and at the chambers of the his lawyer following the publication in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-109
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia
RUSSIAN CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF ENTREPRENEURS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Electoral rights protection of property functioning of justice and lack of remedy: Disproportionate and unlawful refusal of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13549
S.C. v. the United Kingdom
S.C. v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/11/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial as a result of criminal proceedings in the Crown Court against a minor of 11 years old with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2694
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SALIYEV v. Russia
SALIYEV v. Russia RUS 21/01/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the withdrawal in 2001 of the Magadan newspapers containing the applicant s article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13777
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania
SAMOILA AND CIONCA v. Romania ROU 04/06/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to bring arrested applicants promptly before the judge refusal of competent court to review the lawfulness of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16653
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria AUT 13/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the first applicant s conviction to a suspended fine and the media company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-915