Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine UKR 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The group of cases concerns the disproportionate refusal of the authorities at different periods between 2005 2014 to provide an NGO and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55745
CORALLO v. the Netherlands
CORALLO v. the Netherlands NLD 09/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: This case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant s detention in the Philipsburg Police Station on Sint Maarten situated in the Caribbean where he was detained EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50579
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
MAJEWSKI v. Poland
MAJEWSKI v. Poland POL 11/01/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20588
MELNIK v. Ukraine
MELNIK v. Ukraine UKR 28/06/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31318
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
MIRONOVAS AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 02/05/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: These cases concern the poor conditions of detention in long term detention facilities between 2008 and the date of the judgments violation of Article 3 . The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4369
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
N. v. Romania
N. v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe shortage in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49121
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus CYP 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and against ill treatment: Disproportionate and unlawful interference due to the limitation of visiting rights and monitoring of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3201
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222