Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 70
ADEISHVILI (MAZMISHVILI) v. Russia
ADEISHVILI MAZMISHVILI v. Russia RUS 16/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant on account of the overcrowded conditions of his detention in the special detention centre for foreigners in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14044
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
AMANN v. Switzerland
AMANN v. Switzerland CHE 16/02/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Lack of predictability of the legislation regarding the monitoring of the telephone lines and the storing of intercepted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4672
ANNUNZIATA v. Italy
ANNUNZIATA v. Italy ITA 06/11/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to arbitrary monitoring of prisoners correspondence based on a lack of a clear legal framework. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44685
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Excessive length of civil labour criminal and enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5038
BAGARELLA v. Italy
BAGARELLA v. Italy ITA 07/07/2008 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:08 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary monitoring of a prisoner s correspondence up to 2004 deriving from a lack of a clear legal framework. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42469
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARBULESCU v. Romania
BARBULESCU v. Romania ROU 05/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of private life and of correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of an employee s use of the Internet at his place of work and use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47645
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BORIS POPOV v. Russia
BORIS POPOV v. Russia RUS 28/01/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns monitoring of both private and privileged correspondence notably with the lawyer by the prison authorities Article 8 in the Tomsk Region in 2008 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13825
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. Ukraine UKR 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The group of cases concerns the disproportionate refusal of the authorities at different periods between 2005 2014 to provide an NGO and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55745
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
CORDELLA AND OTHERS v. Italy
CORDELLA AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns the national authorities failure to take the necessary measures to ensure the protection of the applicants local residents from the environmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52515
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DIMCHO DIMOV v. Bulgaria
DIMCHO DIMOV v. Bulgaria BGR 16/03/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and protection of private life: Prolonged unjustified immobilisation of the applicant to a bed in a prison medical centre following his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4045
DOERGA v. the Netherlands
DOERGA v. the Netherlands NLD 27/07/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to his conviction on the basis of the improper use of information obtained through the interception of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4515