Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 216
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus CYP 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and against ill treatment: Disproportionate and unlawful interference due to the limitation of visiting rights and monitoring of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3201
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/01/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/ Conditions of detention: Structural problem of inadequate detention conditions particularly overcrowding aggravated by factors such as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39886
ORLOVSKAYA ISKRA v. Russia
ORLOVSKAYA ISKRA v. Russia RUS 03/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Violations of freedom of expression related to election campaigns Article 10 in various regions in 2007 2018 including because of a complete ban under the Russian law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47513
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to arbitrary monitoring of their correspondence during their detention due to shortcomings in the Prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43013
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PANTEA v. Romania
PANTEA v. Romania ROU 03/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13075
PARASCINETI v. Romania
PARASCINETI v. Romania ROU 13/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13027
PECK v. the United Kingdom
PECK v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/04/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and lack of effective remedy: Disclosure in the media by a local council of an individual s photographs taken by a CCTV camera installed in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2236
PENARANDA SOTO v. Malta
PENARANDA SOTO v. Malta MLT 19/03/2018 00:00:00 04/04/2018 15:18:40 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Unlawful monitoring by the prison authorities of the applicant s correspondence with the ECHR. Article 34 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49205
PETRA v. Romania
PETRA v. Romania ROU 23/09/1998 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence and the right to petition: Monitoring of the applicant s correspondence during his detention with the former European Commission of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15959
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PETROV v. Bulgaria
PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Disproportionate and discriminatory interference with private and family life and correspondence excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of remedy: Unjustified EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14347
PIHONI v. Albania
PIHONI v. Albania ALB 13/05/2018 00:00:00 13/06/2018 16:15:19 Case Description: The case concerns allegations of excessive use of force by the police and failure to conduct an effective investigation into the incident an altercation between the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49563
POCUCA v. Croatia
POCUCA v. Croatia HRV 29/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of effective remedy: Excessive length of pension proceedings before administrative authorities and courts as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10351
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
PRADO BUGALLO v. Spain
PRADO BUGALLO v. Spain ESP 18/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to interception of the applicant s telephone communication in the context of criminal investigations on the ground EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3485
PUTO AND OTHERS v. Albania
PUTO AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 22/11/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice protection of property and lack of an effective remedy: Domestic authorities failure to execute final judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-243
PUZINAS v. Lithuania
PUZINAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/06/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful interference due to the monitoring and censoring of the applicant s letters in prison. Article 8 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4183