Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 46
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia
ASHOT HARUTYUNYAN v. Armenia ARM 15/09/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: Ashot Harutynyan 34334/04 final on 15/09/2010 Jhangiryan 44765/08 final on 18/05/2021 Shirkhanyan 54547/16 final on 22/05/2022 Voskanyan 623/13 final on 24/01/2023 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-349
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BIGOVIC v. Montenegro
BIGOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 19/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s degrading treatment on account of poor conditions of his detention in an overcrowded remand prison between February 2006 and August 2009 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52527
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 10/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to provide sufficient reasons to justify the administrative detention in 2014 for five months and twenty days of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50019
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
DODOV v. Bulgaria
DODOV v. Bulgaria BGR 17/04/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Right to life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Absence in practice of effective judicial remedies allowing to establish the circumstances of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14625
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/06/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These two cases concern inhuman and degrading conditions of detention violations of Article 3 . In the Insanov case the applicant a former Minister of Health Care was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1801
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KAVALA v. Turkey
KAVALA v. Turkey TUR 11/05/2020 00:00:00 19/05/2020 11:23:58 Case Description: The applicant in the Kavala case was arrested on 18 October 2017 and placed in pre trial detention accused of attempting to overthrow the government within the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55161
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213