Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 179
SIRVINSKAS v. Lithuania
SIRVINSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 23/10/2019 00:00:00 06/11/2019 17:49:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unfairness of the domestic courts decision making process in a divorce case with regard to the application of interim measures and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54135
SNEERSONE AND KAMPANELLA v. Italy
SNEERSONE AND KAMPANELLA v. Italy ITA 12/10/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 09:49:20 Case Description: Return order of a minor child: judicial decisions taken in 2008 and 2009 on the basis of the Hague Convention of 1980 and Council Regulation EC No. 2201/2003 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36569
SOARES DE MELO v. Portugal
SOARES DE MELO v. Portugal PRT 16/05/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of a mother s six children for adoption on grounds of mother s poverty and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8853
SOBOTA-GAJIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
SOBOTA GAJIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 06/02/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities for six years to take all reasonable measures to facilitate a mother s reunion with her son despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4151
SOLCAN v. Romania
SOLCAN v. Romania ROU 08/01/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 09:50:51 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities refusal to allow the applicant who is confined in a psychiatric facility as a security measure to attend her mother s funeral in 2013 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54705
SPORER v. Austria
SPORER v. Austria AUT 03/05/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discriminatory treatment during custody proceedings of fathers of children born out of wedlock: difference in treatment as regards the judicial scrutiny in the attribution of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1081
STAMOSE v. Bulgaria
STAMOSE v. Bulgaria BGR 27/02/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Unjustified and disproportionate interference with freedom of movement and absence of effective remedy: Two years travel ban for having breached the Immigration Rules of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14445
STASIK v. Poland
STASIK v. Poland POL 06/01/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Delays in the enforcement proceedings concerning the applicants visiting rights with their children violation of Article 8 of the Convention . The Stasik case also concerns the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20634
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
SVERNEI v. the Republic of Moldova
SVERNEI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 19/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on account of the failure of the domestic authorities to assist the applicant in preserving his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58745
SYLVESTER v. Austria
SYLVESTER v. Austria AUT 24/07/2003 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Domestic court s failure to take adequate measures to enforce court decisions ordering the return of a child to her father living in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-889
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova
T.M. AND C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/04/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:25:58 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligations under Article 3 on account of the manner of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14229
T.P. AND K.M. v. the United Kingdom
T.P. AND K.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the failure of the local authority to ensure adequate involvement of a mother in the decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2484
T. v. the Czech Republic
T. v. the Czech Republic CZE 17/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Authorities failure to ensure the maintenance of family ties between a father and his daughter who was placed in care following the death of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6372
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
TAPAYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 23/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicants right to family life on account of the authorities failure to enforce a domestic judgment ordering that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59929
TARAK AND DEPE v. Turkey
TARAK AND DEPE v. Turkey TUR 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 16:37:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Arbitrary and arrest and police detention of an unaccompanied minor and later of his mother for questioning in the context of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52623
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia
TKHELIDZE v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: These cases concern the State s failure to take preventive action with a view to protecting the applicants female relatives from domestic violence culminating in their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58703
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TOPCIC-ROSENBERG v. Croatia
TOPCIC ROSENBERG v. Croatia HRV 24/03/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the Croatian Health Insurance Fund and the Administrative Court in 2006 2009 to grant an adoptive self employed mother maternity leave EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12381