Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BORZHONOV v. Russia
BORZHONOV v. Russia RUS 22/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to respect the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retention of their property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13819
CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. v. Italy
CENTRO DEMARZIO S.R.L. v. Italy ITA 05/07/2018 00:00:00 25/07/2018 10:52:14 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the unlawful revocation between 1993 and 1997 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49887
CROCE AND OTHERS v. Italy
CROCE AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 16/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the expropriation of a private land for the construction of a public road and failure of the national authorities to guarantee the payment of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59101
FELDMAN AND SLOVYANSKYY BANK v. Ukraine
FELDMAN AND SLOVYANSKYY BANK v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right of access to a court because the applicant a Ukrainian bank was not able to challenge before the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49603
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant bank to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions on account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39457
KECHKO v. Ukraine
KECHKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Arbitrary interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retroactive application of a legislative act by the domestic courts in civil EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26442
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
NACAKIS v. Türkiye
NACAKIS v. T rkiye TUR 29/11/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions on account of the inability to inherit real estate in T rkiye due to the reciprocity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61980
NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. Bulgaria
NATIONAL MOVEMENT EKOGLASNOST v. Bulgaria BGR 15/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: This case concerns an infringement of the applicant association s right to peaceful of its possessions due to an order to pay lawyer s fees in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57167
NESIC v. Montenegro
NESIC v. Montenegro MNE 09/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: This case concerns an unlawful interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of deprivation of land he owned on the coast EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55927
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
SOCIETATEA ROMANA DE TELEVIZIUNE v. the Republic of Moldova
SOCIETATEA ROMANA DE TELEVIZIUNE v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Freedom of information and protection of property: Friendly settlement with special undertaking: authorities acknowledged the breach EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7626
TANASOV v. Romania
TANASOV v. Romania ROU 31/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2018 15:40:34 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of the confiscation of two silver ingots EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48093
VASILYEV AND KOVTUN v. Russia
VASILYEV AND KOVTUN v. Russia RUS 13/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicants right to access to court on account of a blanket ban on considering claims for losses sustained as a result of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13809