Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 28
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
BUSINESS SI INVESTITII PENTRU TOTI v. the Republic of Moldova
BUSINESS SI INVESTITII PENTRU TOTI v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 13/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the violation of the applicants right to access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to consider EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7001
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden
CENTRUM FOR RATTVISA v. Sweden SWE 25/05/2021 00:00:00 28/05/2021 14:53:04 Case Description: This case concerns the alleged risk that the applicant foundation s communications had been or would be intercepted and examined by way of signals intelligence as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57667
DALBAN v. Romania
DALBAN v. Romania ROU 28/09/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Criminal convictions of journalists for insult and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15961
DICLE AND SADAK v. Turkey
DICLE AND SADAK v. Turkey TUR 16/09/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicants right to be presumed innocent on account of the fact that the domestic court referred to them as the accused convicted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37342
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GUBACSI v. Hungary
GUBACSI v. Hungary HUN 28/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns ill treatment between 2000 and 2016 by law enforcement officers during the applicants arrest transfer and detention and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10515
IGNATOV v. Ukraine
IGNATOV v. Ukraine UKR 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: The cases of the Ignatov group concern structural problems relating to arrest and pre trial detention. They concern certain deficiencies in the legislation in particular the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46503
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
MELNIK v. Ukraine
MELNIK v. Ukraine UKR 28/06/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31318
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744