Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 53
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/04/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37402
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KISS MENCZEL v. Hungary
KISS MENCZEL v. Hungary HUN 09/06/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case concerns the applicant s conviction in a trial where a witness whose deposition was decisive for the outcome of the case failed to appear for examination by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55359
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
MAJEWSKI v. Poland
MAJEWSKI v. Poland POL 11/01/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20588
MCKERR v. the United Kingdom
MCKERR v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/08/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: These cases concern investigations into the deaths of the applicants next of kin in Northern Ireland in the 1980s and 1990s either during security force operations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2202
MEIMANIS v. Latvia
MEIMANIS v. Latvia LVA 21/10/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to interception of telephone conversations without the ex post facto judicial approval for the interception of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12694
MELNIK v. Ukraine
MELNIK v. Ukraine UKR 28/06/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31318
MERIT v. Ukraine
MERIT v. Ukraine UKR 30/06/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31316
MIRONESCU v. Romania
MIRONESCU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified restriction of the applicant s voting rights which had not been restricted by court order as a result of his inability to vote in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59927
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova
OLARU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/10/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Structural problem highlighted by the Court applying the pilot judgment procedure: violations of the applicants right of access to a court and right to peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7092
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
SABEH EL LEIL v. France
SABEH EL LEIL v. France FRA 29/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:19:15 Case Description: Denial of access to a court on the ground of State immunity from jurisdiction: By upholding an objection based on State immunity and thus dismissing the claim of a non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33315