Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 101
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction on the basis of testimony obtained in the US before trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43007
A.P., GARCON AND NICOT v. France
A.P. GARCON AND NICOT v. France FRA 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the second and third applicants due to refusal of transgender persons requests to have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47539
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. Portugal
ALBERTINA CARVALHO E FILHOS LDA v. Portugal PRT 04/07/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings and enforcement proceedings before the courts of first instance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47457
ALIEV v. Georgia
ALIEV v. Georgia GEO 13/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention/protection against ill treatment: Degrading conditions of detention in Prison No. 5 of Tbilisi alleged ill treatment inflicted by prison and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5814
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the delay of 14 years taken by the authorities to issue to a citizen of a member state of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33179
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
BAYTAR v. Turkey
BAYTAR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction partly based on statements obtained without the assistance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37330
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria
BEVACQUA AND S. v. Bulgaria BGR 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure to take appropriate action in the context of divorce proceedings in particular to decide rapidly on interim custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14743
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
BIVOLARU AND MOLDOVAN v. France
BIVOLARU AND MOLDOVAN v. France FRA 25/06/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Manifestly deficient protection of the second applicant s rights in the context of his surrender by France to Romania for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58085
BOROTYUK v. Ukraine
BOROTYUK v. Ukraine UKR 16/03/2011 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Unfair proceedings resulting in convictions on the basis of self incriminating EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25337
CESNIEKS v. Latvia
CESNIEKS v. Latvia LVA 11/05/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the use of evidence obtained through ill treatment of the accused. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12662
CHERNETSKIY v. Ukraine
CHERNETSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:19:00 Case Description: The case concerns the unjustified restriction on the applicant s right to marry between February 2005 and October 2008 while serving a prison sentence because a divorce EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46265
CILIZ v. the Netherlands
CILIZ v. the Netherlands NLD 11/07/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decision not to extend the applicant s residence permit and to expel him while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4471
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682