Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 109
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction on the basis of testimony obtained in the US before trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43007
A.P., GARCON AND NICOT v. France
A.P. GARCON AND NICOT v. France FRA 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the second and third applicants due to refusal of transgender persons requests to have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47539
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France
ARISTIMUNO MENDIZABAL v. France FRA 17/04/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the delay of 14 years taken by the authorities to issue to a citizen of a member state of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33179
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALTINS v. Latvia
BALTINS v. Latvia LVA 08/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:32:42 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Domestic courts failure to properly address the incitement plea in criminal proceedings raised by the applicant who claimed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31154
BARTENBACH v. Austria
BARTENBACH v. Austria AUT 20/06/2008 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Length and unfairness of criminal administrative proceedings for illegally employing a foreign citizen breach of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-549
BAYTAR v. Turkey
BAYTAR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction partly based on statements obtained without the assistance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37330
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
BIVOLARU AND MOLDOVAN v. France
BIVOLARU AND MOLDOVAN v. France FRA 25/06/2021 00:00:00 09/07/2021 15:53:26 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Manifestly deficient protection of the second applicant s rights in the context of his surrender by France to Romania for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58085
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania ROU 01/10/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: After having obtained the annulment of the forced sale of their property in a fist action rejection of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17411
CESNIEKS v. Latvia
CESNIEKS v. Latvia LVA 11/05/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings due to the use of evidence obtained through ill treatment of the accused. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12662
CHERNETSKIY v. Ukraine
CHERNETSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:19:00 Case Description: The case concerns the unjustified restriction on the applicant s right to marry between February 2005 and October 2008 while serving a prison sentence because a divorce EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46265
CILIZ v. the Netherlands
CILIZ v. the Netherlands NLD 11/07/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decision not to extend the applicant s residence permit and to expel him while EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4471
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
CWIK v. Poland
CWIK v. Poland POL 05/02/2021 00:00:00 25/02/2021 08:53:01 Case Description: Admission of evidence obtained through ill treatment of a third party by private individuals in the criminal proceedings against the applicant in 2008 violation of Article 6 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56721