Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 74
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
G.N. AND OTHERS v. Italy
G.N. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 01/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Right to life and discrimination: Excessive length of compensation proceedings for persons contaminated with HIV during blood transfusions and different treatment with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28236
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
JURISIC v. Croatia
JURISIC v. Croatia HRV 16/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of non enforcement of judicial decisions whereby the applicant was granted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54667
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland
KAPRYKOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/05/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of adequate medical care in detention inadequate detention conditions or insufficient consideration of detainees state of health by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39907
KAVALA v. Turkey
KAVALA v. Turkey TUR 11/05/2020 00:00:00 19/05/2020 11:23:58 Case Description: The applicant in the Kavala case was arrested on 18 October 2017 and placed in pre trial detention accused of attempting to overthrow the government within the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55161
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KHURSHID MUSTAFA AND TARZIBACHI v. Sweden
KHURSHID MUSTAFA AND TARZIBACHI v. Sweden SWE 16/03/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate Interference with the right to receive and impart information due to eviction of Swedish nationals of Iraqi EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2172
KLEYN AND ALEKSANDROVICH v. Russia
KLEYN AND ALEKSANDROVICH v. Russia RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:09:02 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to life on account of a failure to effectively investigate the death of the applicants wife and mother a woman of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26114
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
L.M. v. Slovenia
L.M. v. Slovenia SVN 12/09/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful involuntary confinement in the closed wards of the Idrija and Ljubljana Psychiatric Hospitals and the open ward EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7414
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LOIZIDOU v. Turkey
LOIZIDOU v. Turkey TUR 26/08/1993 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Continuous denial of access to and interference with property rights in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37072
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine
LUTSENKO v. Ukraine UKR 19/11/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The applicant was at the relevant time an opposition politician who was subject to pre trial detention in 2010 which the Court found to have been imposed for ulterior EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32285
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MAGO v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 24/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:11:36 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of their property on account of their inability to repossess their pre war military EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3435
MATTHIES-LENZEN v. Luxemburg
MATTHIES LENZEN v. Luxemburg LUX 05/02/2002 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages and lack of an effective remedy. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-107