Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 35
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CHOWDURY AND OTHERS v. Greece
CHOWDURY AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 30/06/2017 00:00:00 21/07/2017 15:08:00 Case Description: Slavery and forced labour: Failure to prevent the human trafficking of 42 applicants nationals of Bangladesh and their subjection to agricultural labour EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47491
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
GOMI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to life on account of the lack of an effective investigation into the death of the applicants relatives the G mi and others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37220
HALFORD v. the United Kingdom
HALFORD v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/06/1997 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Illegal interferences due to the interception of telephone calls made on the applicant s office telephone linked to internal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2362
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. Poland
HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. Poland POL 19/06/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of property: Systemic problem the malfunctioning of national legislation on housing in that: it imposed restrictions on landlords rights and did not provide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39852
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KAVALA v. Turkey
KAVALA v. Turkey TUR 11/05/2020 00:00:00 19/05/2020 11:23:58 Case Description: The applicant in the Kavala case was arrested on 18 October 2017 and placed in pre trial detention accused of attempting to overthrow the government within the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55161
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHANH v. Cyprus
KHANH v. Cyprus CYP 04/12/2018 00:00:00 11/12/2018 15:45:04 Case Description: These cases mainly concern the poor conditions of the applicants detention pending deportation violation of Article 3 of the Convention . The Khanh case concerns the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50919
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
M.A. v. Cyprus
M.A. v. Cyprus CYP 23/10/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: This case concerns the detention of an asylum seeker between June 2010 and May 2011. The European Court found that the applicant s detention had been unlawful because it had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3213
M.S.S. v. Belgium
M.S.S. v. Belgium BEL 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41571