Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 69
A.B.V. v. Russia
A.B.V. v. Russia RUS 02/01/2019 00:00:00 24/01/2019 10:13:38 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51193
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Bulgarian authorities to effectively pursue adequate and timely actions to enforce the first and third applicants custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47553
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
CATAN AND OTHERS v. Russia
CATAN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 19/10/2012 00:00:00 07/10/2016 11:10:00 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the rights of children parents and staff members of Latin script schools located in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom
CORNWELL v. the United Kingdom GBR 25/07/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2566
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy
COVEZZI AND MORSELLI v. Italy ITA 24/09/2003 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to involve parents adequately in the decision making process concerning the removal of the applicants children and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43946
D'ACUNTO AND PIGNATARO v. Italy
D ACUNTO AND PIGNATARO v. Italy ITA 12/07/2018 00:00:00 23/07/2018 10:41:15 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants access rights to their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49875
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/11/2007 00:00:00 12/06/2018 11:57:23 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination in the enjoyment by the applicants of their right to education due to their much higher likelihood because of their Roma 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31
DOWNIE v. the United Kingdom
DOWNIE v. the United Kingdom GBR 21/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to women. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2584
E.S. v. Romania and Bulgaria
E.S. v. Romania and Bulgaria BGR ROU 19/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to respect for her family life due to the excessive length of custody proceedings in respect of her minor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39539
EBERHARD AND M. v. Slovenia
EBERHARD AND M. v. Slovenia SVN 01/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take adequate and effective steps to enforce an administrative access order and inefficient subsequent court proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7110
F.Z. v. Norway
F.Z. v. Norway NOR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to shortcomings in the public child welfare authorities and courts decision making processes concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58033
FIELDING v. the United Kingdom
FIELDING v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/01/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex as social security benefits for widowed parents were only available to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2570
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 29/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Right to education: Refusal to grant full exemption from instruction in Christianity religion and philosophy in State primary schools right Article 2 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-187
FURMAN v. Slovenia and Austria
FURMAN v. Slovenia and Austria SVN 05/05/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:51:27 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference as a result of the excessive length of proceedings concerning custody and visiting rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22990
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. Russia
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. Russia RUS 05/08/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55759
HAASE v. Germany
HAASE v. Germany DEU 08/07/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to a court decision to temporarily withdraw parental rights in respect of seven children without sufficient and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38414
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905