Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 138 of 138
TODOROVA v. Italy
TODOROVA v. Italy ITA 13/04/2009 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Authorities failure to ensure that the applicant s consent to giving up her children had been given in full knowledge of its implications and had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44575
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TROSIN v. Ukraine
TROSIN v. Ukraine UKR 23/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / discrimination / cooperation with ECtHR: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions of family visits in prison as regards their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31624
TSOURLAKIS v. Greece
TSOURLAKIS v. Greece GRC 01/03/2010 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Lacking protection of private and family life: lack of access to a welfare report on the applicant s child s life conditions prepared by the Athens Child Welfare Society EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22496
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
VALSAMIS v. Greece
VALSAMIS v. Greece GRC 18/12/1996 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Freedom of religion and right to education: Disproportionate interference due to a pupil a Jehovah s witness suspension from school who had refused because of her pacifist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22134
VENEMA v. the Netherlands
VENEMA v. the Netherlands NLD 17/03/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified failure to allow parents to participate in the decision making process having led to a provisional placement of their daughter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4375
VLASOV v. Russia
VLASOV v. Russia RUS 12/09/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations found on account of unlawful restrictions of detainees right to family visits Article 8 in three types of detention: as regards pre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13603
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg LUX 28/09/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Protection of family life access to and efficient functioning of justice and discrimination: Refusal to enforce a full adoption order by a foreign court in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-117
WALLOVA AND WALLA v. Czech Republic
WALLOVA AND WALLA v. Czech Republic CZE 26/03/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Order to take children into public care solely for socioeconomic reasons in particular inadequate housing conditions. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6296
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom
WILLIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/09/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of sex on the ground that social benefits for widowed parents were only available EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2550
X v. Croatia
X v. Croatia HRV 01/12/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Exclusion of the applicants in the case of X the applicant was divested of her capacity to act while in the case of A.K. and L. the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10089
YUSUPOVA v. Russia
YUSUPOVA v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46595
Z. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
Z. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and lacking effective remedy: Failure of local authorities to protect minor children from serious long term neglect and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2490
ZAUNEGGER v. Germany
ZAUNEGGER v. Germany DEU 03/03/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 09:49:20 Case Description: Custody of a child born out of wedlock: discriminatory legislation preventing the father of a child born out of wedlock to obtain joint custody vis vis fathers who had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36563
ZAWADKA v. Poland
ZAWADKA v. Poland POL 12/10/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take appropriate measures to enforce a father s right of contact with his minor son in particular to encourage the parties to co operate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17971
ZENGIN v. Turkey
ZENGIN v. Turkey TUR 09/01/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: This group concerns the failure within the Turkish legal framework to grant legal recognition to the Alevi faith 1 thus depriving its followers of the right fully to practice EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37090
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia
ZORICA JOVANOVIC v. Serbia SRB 09/09/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life on account of the respondent State s continuing failure to provide her with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7011