Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 44
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 25/12/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to obtain a full judicial review of the authorities decisions permitting the construction of a railway EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2190
BABYLONOVA v. Slovakia
BABYLONOVA v. Slovakia SVK 20/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference due to legal inability to obtain the cancellation of a former resident s registration in the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7999
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
CSOMA v. Romania
CSOMA v. Romania ROU 15/04/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life: Medical procedure necessary due to pregnancy complications leading to permanent inability to bear children carried out without the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17564
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
DIMITROV-KAZAKOV v. Bulgaria
DIMITROV KAZAKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of private life: Name registered in police records of offenders on the basis of a confidential internal instruction of the Ministry of Interior of 1993 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14383
GILLAN AND QUINTON v. the United Kingdom
GILLAN AND QUINTON v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/06/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of adequate safeguards on police powers to stop and search individuals suspected of terror offences under section 44 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2890
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GROSARU v. Romania
GROSARU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Just satisfaction paid. The impugned law was repealed and replaced by Law no. 208/2015. In the current system there are two autonomous bodies competent in the electoral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13081
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to discharge their positive obligation to protect the applicant from ill treatment while he was under their full EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55845
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KAVALA v. Turkey
KAVALA v. Turkey TUR 11/05/2020 00:00:00 19/05/2020 11:23:58 Case Description: The applicant in the Kavala case was arrested on 18 October 2017 and placed in pre trial detention accused of attempting to overthrow the government within the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55161
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107