Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 33
A. A. M. v. Sweden
A. A. M. v. Sweden SWE 03/07/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s expulsion to parts of Iraq situated outside the Kurdistan region. Status of Execution: On 16/08/2015 the Migration Agency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2200
ALIYEV v. Ukraine
ALIYEV v. Ukraine UKR 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unjustified interference due to the revocation in 2010 of the applicant s residence permit and the issuance of an expulsion order with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57741
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 25/12/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to obtain a full judicial review of the authorities decisions permitting the construction of a railway EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2190
BADER AND KANBOR v. Sweden
BADER AND KANBOR v. Sweden SWE 08/02/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Dismissal of the asylum application of a Syrian husband his wife and their children and adoption of a decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2160
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BUTT v. Norway
BUTT v. Norway NOR 04/03/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Interference with family and private life in case of deportation to Pakistan Status of Execution: Immigration Appeals Board granted permanent residence in 2012. One of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-213
CSOMA v. Romania
CSOMA v. Romania ROU 15/04/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life: Medical procedure necessary due to pregnancy complications leading to permanent inability to bear children carried out without the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17564
DE CLERCK v. Belgium
DE CLERCK v. Belgium BEL 25/12/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1193
DIMITROV-KAZAKOV v. Bulgaria
DIMITROV KAZAKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of private life: Name registered in police records of offenders on the basis of a confidential internal instruction of the Ministry of Interior of 1993 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14383
F.G. v. Sweden
F.G. v. Sweden SWE 23/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:39:23 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Proposed expulsion to Iran without adequate investigation of reality and implications of conversion to Christianity after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2064
F.N. AND OTHERS v. Sweden
F.N. AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 18/03/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Uzbekistan. Status of Execution: According to Swedish Law if an international body EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2188
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GROSARU v. Romania
GROSARU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Just satisfaction paid. The impugned law was repealed and replaced by Law no. 208/2015. In the current system there are two autonomous bodies competent in the electoral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13081
HOTI v. Croatia
HOTI v. Croatia HRV 26/07/2018 00:00:00 19/10/2018 11:51:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of domestic authorities to provide an effective and accessible procedure to have the stateless applicant s stay and status in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50582
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to discharge their positive obligation to protect the applicant from ill treatment while he was under their full EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55845
I v. Sweden
I v. Sweden SWE 20/01/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Chechnya Status of Execution: The applicant was granted permanent residence. The judgment was translated published and disseminated. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2192
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway
LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 22/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to strike a fair balance between the interests of the applicant landowners the lessors and the leaseholders the lessees notably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-207
MELNYCHENKO v. Ukraine
MELNYCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Electoral rights: Arbitrary refusal by the Central Electoral Commission upheld by the Supreme Court of the applicant s registration as a parliamentary candidate on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31100