Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 521 - 540 of 627
STANKOVA v. Slovakia
STANKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 31/03/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of home: Disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to respect for her home following her eviction without being offered alternative accommodation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8105
STEEL AND MORRIS v. the United Kingdom
STEEL AND MORRIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/05/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Breach of principle of equality of arms in defamation proceedings due to denial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2712
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 03/08/2001 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for having refused to serve in the army on the ground of conscientious EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14281
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria
STEFANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 16/11/2021 00:00:00 19/11/2021 15:34:10 Case Description: This case concerns the retention in 2013 of a memory key belonging to the applicant who is a lawyer and the copying and possible storing of the information recorded on it EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58873
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a remedy to challenge one s placement in security cells which had a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9695
STELIAN ROSCA v. Romania
STELIAN ROSCA v. Romania ROU 04/09/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Absence of a legal basis for an involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation in the context of incapacitation proceedings and inability to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13103
STOICESCU (I) v. Romania
STOICESCU I v. Romania ROU 26/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to comply with the obligation to protect the applicant s physical and psychological EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17498
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania
STRAIN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 30/11/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The violations found in the 16 judgments currently 1 examined in this group originated in structural deficiencies in the mechanisms set up in Romania as of 1990 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12742
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania ALB 21/05/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was found not criminally liable for attempted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55687
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
STRUNGARIU v. Romania
STRUNGARIU v. Romania ROU 29/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure to enforce final judicial decisions ordering the applicants reinstatement in the posts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13085
STURUA v. Georgia
STURUA v. Georgia GEO 27/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to a fair hearing in the context of disciplinary proceedings as a result of which they were removed from their posts as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46975
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary HUN 12/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the stateless applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the protracted failure of the authorities notably for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55805
SUKACHOV v. Ukraine
SUKACHOV v. Ukraine UKR 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55367
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern the interference with the applicants rights under Article 1 of Protocol No.1 legitimate expectation resulting from the failure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32283
SURIKOV v. Ukraine
SURIKOV v. Ukraine UKR 26/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The case concerns the unlawful collection retention and use of sensitive obsolete and irrelevant data concerning the applicant s mental health in considering his application EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46989
SUSO MUSA v. Malta
SUSO MUSA v. Malta MLT 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and against ill treatment: Arbitrary detention of asylum seekers without effective and speedy remedy under domestic law to challenge the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4127
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia
SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. Russia RUS 17/07/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly the applicants degrading treatment violations of Article 3 in different periods from 2007 to 2017 on account of their confinement in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14144
SY v. Italy
SY v. Italy ITA 24/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary prison despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60281
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary
SZABO AND VISSY v. Hungary HUN 06/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group concerns the violation of the applicants right to respect for private and family life and for correspondence on account of the Hungarian legislation on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10745