Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 601 - 620 of 627
VOOL AND TOOMIK v. Estonia
VOOL AND TOOMIK v. Estonia EST 29/06/2022 00:00:00 18/07/2022 12:59:58 Case Description: This case concerns the unjustified difference in treatment as concerns long term visits of the applicants as persons in pre trial detention between 2011 and 2016 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60753
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
VOYKIN AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 27/06/2018 00:00:00 24/07/2018 10:18:38 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of the second applicant the wife of the first applicant namely during an altercation on the street in 2008 with an off duty EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49883
VUKOTA-BOJIC v. Switzerland
VUKOTA BOJIC v. Switzerland CHE 18/01/2017 00:00:00 13/04/2017 16:28:22 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to secret surveillance of a social insurance claimant by private investigators without sufficient legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46669
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg
WAGNER AND J.M.W.L. v. Luxemburg LUX 28/09/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Protection of family life access to and efficient functioning of justice and discrimination: Refusal to enforce a full adoption order by a foreign court in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-117
WENNER v. Germany
WENNER v. Germany DEU 01/12/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 17:05:58 Case Description: Failure of the respondent state to ensure that the health of the applicant a long term heroin addict without any realistic chance of overcoming addiction and having received EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45805
WIKTORKO v. Poland
WIKTORKO v. Poland POL 30/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Ill treatment in a sobering up centre and lack of an effective investigation Status of Execution: Reopening of investigation impossible due to prescription. In 2001 the 1982 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18273
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
X v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 17/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the transgender applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the absence of quick transparent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52421
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y v. Norway
Y v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disrespect of the presumption of innocence on account of judicial acts implying suspicion of criminal guilt in compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-185
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YANKOV v. Bulgaria
YANKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 11/03/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of rights in detention: Shaving of a detainee s head disciplinary punishment for insulting officials in the draft manuscript of a book EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14291
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 16/10/2018 15:10:36 Case Description: This group of cases concerns interferences with the applicants right to respect for their home or their private and family life as a result of eviction or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1924
YUKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine
YUKHYMOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 17/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: The case concerns the killing of the applicant s son in 1999 during an attempt to arrest him violation of substantive limb of Article 2 and ineffective investigation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57099
Z.H. v. Hungary
Z.H. v. Hungary HUN 08/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant who is deaf and dumb suffering from an intellectual disability illiterate and unable to avail himself of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10545
ZAJA v. Croatia
ZAJA v. Croatia HRV 04/01/2017 00:00:00 01/02/2017 17:08:50 Case Description: The cases aja and Lopac concern violations of the applicants right not to be punished without law on account of their conviction of an administrative offence for importing goods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45943
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14078
ZARB ADAMI v. Malta
ZARB ADAMI v. Malta MLT 20/09/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of sex: due to the practice of enrolling many more men than women on the jurors list although the law in force neither provided nor justified EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4075