Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 21 - 40 of 117
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
D. J. v. Croatia
D. J. v. Croatia HRV 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and of private life: Failure to conduct an effective and adequate investigation into the applicant s allegations of rape in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10139
DAGDELEN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DAGDELEN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 25/02/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / access to and effective functioning of justice: Ill treatment during police custody and time barring of the proceedings against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37084
DAVIES v. the United Kingdom
DAVIES v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/10/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2588
DICKSON v. the United Kingdom
DICKSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/12/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the Home Secretary s refusal to grant a prisoner serving a life sentence and his wife their request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2810
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
DURALIYSKI v. Bulgaria
DURALIYSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 04/06/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Unfair civil proceedings over payment of an insurance policy: failure of the Sofia City Court sitting at last instance to submit to adversarial proceedings a decisive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14814
EREMIA v. the Republic of Moldova
EREMIA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 28/08/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Discrimination on the ground of gender and protection against ill treatment: Authorities failure to provide protection from domestic violence and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7033
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GEORGIA v. Russia (I)
GEORGIA v. Russia I RUS 03/07/2014 00:00:00 04/12/2020 16:30:17 Case Description: The case concerns the arrest detention and expulsion from the Russian Federation of large numbers of Georgian nationals from the end of September 2006 until the end of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14138
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344
GRIMKOVSKAYA v. Ukraine
GRIMKOVSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 21/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the level of noise vibration and air and soil pollution caused by a motorway re routed next EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31577
HADZIMEJLIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
HADZIMEJLIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 03/02/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 21:28:10 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security on account of their unlawful placement in a social care home where they were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3161
HANIF v. the United Kingdom
HANIF v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/03/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the presence of a police officer on the jury in a drug s case involving disputed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2987
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
HATTON AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/07/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy: Inability for the applicants to challenge the government policy on night flights at Heathrow airport allegedly interfering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2548
HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. Italy
HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 23/02/2012 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:32:00 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and collective expulsion as well as lack of effective remedy: Return to Libya of 11 Somalian and 13 Eritrean nationals EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45048
HIRST v. the United Kingdom (no. 2)
HIRST v. the United Kingdom no. 2 GBR 06/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Electoral rights: General automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners on voting in parliamentary elections. Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2204
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary
HORVATH AND KISS v. Hungary HUN 29/04/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination against the applicants born in 1994 and 1992 respectively who are of Roma 1 origin on account of their placement in a special school EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10905
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894