Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
CHOCHOLAC v. Slovakia
CHOCHOLAC v. Slovakia SVK 14/11/2022 00:00:00 05/12/2022 18:05:55 Case Description: The case concerns a ban on possession of pornographic material applied in 2013 to the applicant a prisoner serving a life sentence concerning pictures depicting classic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62048
COSIC v. Croatia
COSIC v. Croatia HRV 05/06/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of home: Disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering to vacate flats owned by the state in breach of any procedural safeguards in the eviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12315
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
ŽIBRAT v. Croatia
IBRAT v. Croatia HRV 14/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Delayed enforcement of a final court decision awarding the applicant a house he had bought at a public auction in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58681
IPSEFTEL v. Turkey
IPSEFTEL v. Turkey TUR 26/08/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to recover inherited property or property acquired by possession which had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37100
KAY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
KAY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 21/12/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Impossibility for the applicants to challenge the proportionality of decisions to terminate their leases for state EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2903
LEMO AND OTHERS v. Croatia
LEMO AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 10/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering to vacate flats owned by the state in breach of any procedural safeguards in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12041
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
M.M. v. the Netherlands
M.M. v. the Netherlands NLD 24/09/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence: Unlawful interception of telephone conversations of the applicant by a private individual with the public prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4495
MATOS E SILVA, LDA. & OTHERS v. Portugal
MATOS E SILVA LDA. OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 16/09/1996 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Reduced ability to dispose of the possession of land affected by a public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9269
MC CANN v. the United Kingdom
MC CANN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/08/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of home: Lack of adequate procedural safeguards resulting in an disproportionate interference with the right to respect for one s home following the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2870
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592