Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 26
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta
AMATO GAUCI v. Malta MLT 15/12/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3181
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta
APAP BOLOGNA v. Malta MLT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 19/12/2016 09:27:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45813
ATRISTAIN GOROSABEL v. Spain
ATRISTAIN GOROSABEL v. Spain ESP 09/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of Article 6 1 and 3 c of the Convention due to the use at trial of initial statements by the applicant a terrorist suspect held EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60387
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DEBELIANOVI v. Bulgaria
DEBELIANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 29/06/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Non enforcement of a court decision ordering the restitution of a house which had been classified as a national cultural monument on the ground EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3797
DUMBRAVA v. Romania
DUMBRAVA v. Romania ROU 17/05/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 09:21:40 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate burden due to the deprivation of the applicant of possession as his mother s heir without any compensation. Article 1 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13501
FORMINSTER ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. the Czech Republic
FORMINSTER ENTERPRISES LIMITED v. the Czech Republic CZE 09/01/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Seizure of shares in the applicant company s possession and suspension of right to dispose of them ordered in criminal proceedings against a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6302
GHIGO v. Malta
GHIGO v. Malta MLT 26/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 09:57:19 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations of the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of property due to the operation of rent control legislation related to requisitioned EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3179
GRBAC v. Croatia
GRBAC v. Croatia HRV 04/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: This case concerns violation of the applicant s right to a peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the refusal of domestic courts to acknowledge ownership of certain plots of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60195
HAGIESCU AND OTHERS v. Romania
HAGIESCU AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 13/02/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Denial of access to a court and interference with property rights: Action for recovery of possession of nationalized property had been dismissed without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16293
ŽIBRAT v. Croatia
IBRAT v. Croatia HRV 14/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Delayed enforcement of a final court decision awarding the applicant a house he had bought at a public auction in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58681
IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. Italy
IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. Italy ITA 28/07/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference with and systematic infringement of landlords property rights due to failure to implement domestic court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43835
IPSEFTEL v. Turkey
IPSEFTEL v. Turkey TUR 26/08/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to recover inherited property or property acquired by possession which had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37100
KALUCZA v. Hungary
KALUCZA v. Hungary HUN 24/07/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to private life Article 8 on account of the authorities failure since 2005 to fulfil their positive obligation to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10977
KAY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
KAY AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 21/12/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Impossibility for the applicants to challenge the proportionality of decisions to terminate their leases for state EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2903
LIMAN-IS SENDIKASI (NO 1) v. Turkey
LIMAN IS SENDIKASI NO 1 v. Turkey TUR 11/04/2011 00:00:00 09/02/2018 16:41:55 Case Description: The case of Liman Is 29608/05 concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the failure of the national authorities to enforce final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37182
MOCULESCU v. Romania
MOCULESCU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: Dismissal of the owner s application after having succeeded in recovering possession of a nationalised plot of land for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17540
MURTIC AND CERIMOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MURTIC AND CERIMOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/10/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Lack of access to a court and interference with peaceful enjoyment of possession due to non enforcement of Human Rights Chamber s decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4159
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596