Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 41 - 60 of 64
MILISAVLJEVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MILISAVLJEVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 03/06/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial and peaceful enjoyment of their possession: Non enforcement of final court decisions ordering allocation of suitable replacement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4145
MOCULESCU v. Romania
MOCULESCU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: Dismissal of the owner s application after having succeeded in recovering possession of a nationalised plot of land for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17540
MURTIC AND CERIMOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
MURTIC AND CERIMOVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/10/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:46 Case Description: Lack of access to a court and interference with peaceful enjoyment of possession due to non enforcement of Human Rights Chamber s decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4159
NASTOU v. Greece (no. 1)
NASTOU v. Greece no. 1 GRC 16/04/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the lengthy dispute over the State s claim of ownership of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15577
NIEDZWIECKI v. Germany
NIEDZWIECKI v. Germany DEU 15/02/2006 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and discrimination: Refusal of family benefits under the applicable federal legislation on family allowances for reasons of nationality EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38358
OVCIAROV v. the Republic of Moldova
OVCIAROV v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 12/07/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of a fair trial and disproportionate interference due to the quashing of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7528
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
PLECHANOW v. Poland
PLECHANOW v. Poland POL 07/10/2009 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Failure to comply with positive obligation to provide measures safeguarding the applicants right to the effective enjoyment of their possession: impossibility to obtain EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39901
PRIKYAN AND ANGELOVA v. Bulgaria
PRIKYAN AND ANGELOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 16/05/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of adversarial proceedings before the Supreme Court of Cassation due to the inability to submit arguments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14607
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
RADANOVIC v. Croatia
RADANOVIC v. Croatia HRV 21/03/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to repossess property for a prolonged period of time as a result of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10079
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. Russia RUS 12/04/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These five cases all concern shortcomings in the legal framework surrounding secret surveillance carried out in the context of operational search activities: The Roman EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14134
SAKSKOBURGGOTSKI AND CHROBOK v. Bulgaria
SAKSKOBURGGOTSKI AND CHROBOK v. Bulgaria BGR 28/02/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate ban on any commercial use of forestland allegedly acquired through restitution by the applicants the former King EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59875
SC MASINEXPORTIMPORT INDUSTRIAL GROUP SA v. Romania
SC MASINEXPORTIMPORT INDUSTRIAL GROUP SA v. Romania ROU 01/03/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unfair proceedings due to the annulment of a final court decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16543
SINADINOVSKA v. North Macedonia
SINADINOVSKA v. North Macedonia MKD 16/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of three sets of proceedings civil proceedings for disturbance of possession and subsequent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54607
SZKORITS v. Hungary
SZKORITS v. Hungary HUN 16/12/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to a land registry error resulting in the applicant s inability to obtain possession or use of a plot of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10529
TAMRAZYAN v. Armenia
TAMRAZYAN v. Armenia ARM 19/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns unfair administrative proceedings connected to the alienation to a third person of a plot of land adjacent to Teghut village in the Tavoush region of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54973
THEO NATIONAL CONSTRUCT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova
THEO NATIONAL CONSTRUCT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/01/2023 00:00:00 23/02/2023 15:00:52 Case Description: The case concerns the exclusion of the applicant company incorporated in Romania from the list of partners of Moldovan company as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62677
TRGO v. Croatia
TRGO v. Croatia HRV 11/09/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of property: Refusal of domestic courts to acknowledge ownership of certain plots of land acquired ex lege by adverse possession on the basis of a provision which was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12605
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592