Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 24
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey
AGGUL AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28713
AYGORDU AND AL v. Turkey
AYGORDU AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28711
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
DRAFT - OVA A.S. v. Slovakia
DRAFT OVA A.S. v. Slovakia SVK 09/09/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial on account of extraordinary appeals lodged by the Prosecutor General and allowed by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7721
GUVEN AND AL v. Turkey
GUVEN AND AL v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28683
GUVEN v. Turkey
GUVEN v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicant complained i.a. about his eviction from his village and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28681
INCE AND OTHERS v. Turkey
INCE AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 22/05/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment right to liberty and security protection of private and family life etc.: The applicants complained i.a. about their eviction from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28715
JUCYS v. Lithuania
JUCYS v. Lithuania LTU 08/04/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to prolonged inability of an innocent owner to recover possessions seized in criminal proceedings furs despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4239
KARAKOC v. Turkey
KARAKOC v. Turkey TUR 02/11/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and of property: Alleged forced eviction of the applicant and his family from their village and the destruction of his home and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5486
KECECIOGLU v. Turkey
KECECIOGLU v. Turkey TUR 08/07/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure by administrative authorities to put the expropriated property to the declared use of expropriation and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5598
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia ARM 01/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Non enforcement of a final domestic judgment ordering a private company whose majority shareholder was the State to pay amounts to the applicants for salary arrears EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-415
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KRYVENKYY v. Ukraine
KRYVENKYY v. Ukraine UKR 16/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of a bona fide owner of a land plot without any compensation or another type of appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47019
MIHALEVI v. Bulgaria
MIHALEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 21/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference in the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the loss of the possibility to obtain compensation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49751
NOVOSELETSKIY v. Ukraine
NOVOSELETSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 22/05/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:02:34 Case Description: Lacking protection of the right to respect for home private and family life and interference with right to enjoy his possessions: Eviction from a State owned flat which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26440
PLATAKOU v. Greece
PLATAKOU v. Greece GRC 06/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of access to a court erroneous dismissal of an application for compensation for expropriated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22174
SOCIETATEA ROMANA DE TELEVIZIUNE v. the Republic of Moldova
SOCIETATEA ROMANA DE TELEVIZIUNE v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Freedom of information and protection of property: Friendly settlement with special undertaking: authorities acknowledged the breach EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7626
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine
SOVTRANSAVTO HOLDING v. Ukraine UKR 06/11/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:25:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to the objection protest procedure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25689