Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 42
A. AND B. v. Montenegro
A. AND B. v. Montenegro MNE 05/06/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Unlawful interference with possessions: The applicants foreign currency savings have never been registered and converted into the public debt contrary to the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11152
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia
ANASTASOV v. North Macedonia MKD 26/09/2019 00:00:00 03/10/2019 11:22:51 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions on account of confiscation of his vehicle within the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52869
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia
BERZINS AND OTHERS v. Latvia LVA 21/12/2021 00:00:00 10/01/2022 09:21:48 Case Description: The present case concerns an interference with the applicants right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as they have been unable to use or access their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59297
BORZHONOV v. Russia
BORZHONOV v. Russia RUS 22/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to respect the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retention of their property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13819
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania
BUCEAS AND BUCIAS v. Romania ROU 01/10/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: After having obtained the annulment of the forced sale of their property in a fist action rejection of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17411
BUGAJNY AND OTHERS v. Poland
BUGAJNY AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 01/03/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Violation of the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions: refusal of the authorities in 2000 to expropriate the applicants land which was used for roads EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20602
DABIC v. Croatia
DABIC v. Croatia HRV 18/06/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right of peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the failure of the domestic courts to compensate the applicant in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58015
DACIA S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova
DACIA S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 18/06/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the right to a fair hearing on account of accepting during the period from 2003 to 2008 and in 2015 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6794
ERDEN v. Turkey
ERDEN v. Turkey TUR 23/06/2010 00:00:00 16/11/2016 09:33:08 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to annulment of property title and transfer to Treasury deprivation of property designated EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38708
FELDMAN AND SLOVYANSKYY BANK v. Ukraine
FELDMAN AND SLOVYANSKYY BANK v. Ukraine UKR 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right of access to a court because the applicant a Ukrainian bank was not able to challenge before the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49603
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right of the applicant bank to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions on account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39457
ISMAYILOV v. Russia
ISMAYILOV v. Russia RUS 04/06/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions on account of confiscatory measures during the criminal proceedings from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13769
JUCYS v. Lithuania
JUCYS v. Lithuania LTU 08/04/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to prolonged inability of an innocent owner to recover possessions seized in criminal proceedings furs despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4239
KECECIOGLU v. Turkey
KECECIOGLU v. Turkey TUR 08/07/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Interference with peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Failure by administrative authorities to put the expropriated property to the declared use of expropriation and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5598
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia
KHACHATRYAN v. Armenia ARM 01/03/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Non enforcement of a final domestic judgment ordering a private company whose majority shareholder was the State to pay amounts to the applicants for salary arrears EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-415
KILIC v. Turkey
KILIC v. Turkey TUR 25/10/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the right to a fair trial and/or of the right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions in certain cases on account of the failure by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37276