Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 601 - 620 of 722
STEFEK v. Croatia
STEFEK v. Croatia HRV 02/06/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: The case concerns the excessive costs of civil proceedings which the applicant was ordered to pay by the Osijek County Court in February 2017 as a result of a civil action the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60405
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal
STEGARESCU AND BAHRIN v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of a remedy to challenge one s placement in security cells which had a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9695
STEININGER v. Austria
STEININGER v. Austria AUT 17/07/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:17:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the limited power of review of the Administrative Court as regards the applicant companies EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-537
STERE AND OTHERS v. Romania
STERE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 23/05/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to annulment of final court decisions concerning tax exemptions following an application for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16335
STOINE HRISTOV v. Bulgaria (II)
STOINE HRISTOV v. Bulgaria II BGR 16/01/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3703
STOLLENWERK v. Germany
STOLLENWERK v. Germany DEU 07/12/2017 00:00:00 24/01/2018 09:34:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms because the Court of Appeal took its decisions relating to the continuation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48749
STONE COURT SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A. v. Spain
STONE COURT SHIPPING COMPANY S.A. v. Spain ESP 28/01/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court on account of the inconsistent or particularly strict interpretation by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3483
STORCK v. Germany
STORCK v. Germany DEU 16/09/2005 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of private life: Unlawful admission and detention of the applicant in a private psychiatric clinic on her father s request without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38374
STOYCHEVA v. Bulgaria
STOYCHEVA v. Bulgaria BGR 19/10/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:09:39 Case Description: Protection of property: Failure to enforce a final court judgment restoring a plot of land which had been expropriated during the communist regime and lack of an effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14896
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway
STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 10/09/2019 00:00:00 22/10/2019 16:32:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns breaches of biological parents rights to family life due to decisions taken between 2011 and 2019 in the public child welfare EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54045
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania
STRAZIMIRI v. Albania ALB 21/05/2020 00:00:00 18/08/2020 10:08:56 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was found not criminally liable for attempted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55687
STRUMIA v. Italy
STRUMIA v. Italy ITA 23/09/2016 00:00:00 28/11/2016 16:53:06 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45546
STURUA v. Georgia
STURUA v. Georgia GEO 27/04/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to a fair hearing in the context of disciplinary proceedings as a result of which they were removed from their posts as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46975
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary
SUDITA KEITA v. Hungary HUN 12/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the stateless applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the protracted failure of the authorities notably for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55805
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine
SUKHANOV AND ILCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 26/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern the interference with the applicants rights under Article 1 of Protocol No.1 legitimate expectation resulting from the failure of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32283
SULCAS v. Lithuania
SULCAS v. Lithuania LTU 05/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings lack of an effective remedy Status of Execution: As far as the effective domestic compensatory remedy with regard to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4267
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine
SVETLANA NAUMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These groups of cases pending before the Committee since 2004 and 2005 concern mainly the excessive length of civil Svetlana Naumenko group and criminal Merit group EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31302
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria
SVETLOZAR PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/06/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of criminal Stoine Hristov no. 2 and civil Svetlozar Petrov proceedings violations of Articles 6 1 1 before the most EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3731
SVETOSLAV HRISTOV v. Bulgaria
SVETOSLAV HRISTOV v. Bulgaria BGR 13/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Breach of the principle of legal certainty as domestic law did not prohibit explicitly two consecutive periods of prosecutor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14231
T. AND OTHERS v. Finland
T. AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings lack of effective remedy in this respect one case concerns unfairness EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4796