Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 198
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETROV AND IVANOVA v. Bulgaria
PETROV AND IVANOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 30/06/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases of this group concern breaches to the right to presumption of innocence of the first applicant in the case of Petrov and Ivanova and of the applicant in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3571
PODKOLZINA v. Latvia
PODKOLZINA v. Latvia LVA 09/07/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Electoral rights: Infringement due to the striking off the list of candidates for parliamentary elections in 1998 of a citizen belonging to the Russian speaking minority on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31162
POLSHINA v. Russia
POLSHINA v. Russia RUS 16/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55407
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine
POLTORATSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33455
PONCELET v. Belgium
PONCELET v. Belgium BEL 04/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the prosecution of senior civil servant on basis of reports compiled during an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1531
R.B. v. Estonia
R.B. v. Estonia EST 22/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns procedural deficiencies in the criminal proceedings where the Supreme Court s decision combined with the investigator omission to warn the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58557
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596
REMETIN v. Croatia
REMETIN v. Croatia HRV 11/03/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure by authorities to adequately protect in criminal and in minor offence proceedings the physical integrity of a minor who had been attacked EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10127
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia
ROMEVA v. North Macedonia MKD 12/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the Pension and Disability Fund s decision to discontinue payment of the applicant s retirement pension EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55031
ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. Poland
ROSENZWEIG AND BONDED WAREHOUSES LTD. v. Poland POL 30/11/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate control of property use due to the revocations without precise reason of an export permit and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18013
RTBF v. Belgium
RTBF v. Belgium BEL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to an efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful interference due to the lack of a predictable legal framework as well as clear and constant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1209
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
SAAREKALLAS OU v. Estonia
SAAREKALLAS OU v. Estonia EST 08/02/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: Excessively lengthy civil and administrative proceedings lack of an effective remedy Status of Execution: The authorities have indicated that the problem of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3079
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SAVINY v. Ukraine
SAVINY v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unjustified interference due to insufficient evidence or inadequate assessment of evidence for the decision to remove three children from their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31846