Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 241 - 260 of 313
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
ROTARU v. Romania
ROTARU v. Romania ROU 04/05/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Insufficient safeguards against arbitrary in the processing of personal data: interference with the applicant s right to private life owing to the storage and public EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15963
ROZALIA AVRAM v. Romania
ROZALIA AVRAM v. Romania ROU 16/12/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: infringement of the principle of legal certainty on the ground that the domestic court of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13109
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland
RUTKOWSKI v. Poland POL 07/10/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:53:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26436
S.Z. v. Bulgaria
S.Z. v. Bulgaria BGR 03/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1934
SACALEANU v. Romania
SACALEANU v. Romania ROU 06/12/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 19 judgments in respect of 101 applications 1 relates to the long standing structural problem of non implementation or delayed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12744
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine
SALAKHOV AND ISLYAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 14/06/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of adequate medical assistance to the first applicant in pre trial detention found primarily due to the Government s failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32272
SAN ARGIMIRO ISASA v. Spain
SAN ARGIMIRO ISASA v. Spain ESP 28/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure to carry out an in depth and effective investigation into arguable allegations of ill treatment during arrest and detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5742
SANDU v. the Republic of Moldova
SANDU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/05/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trials resulting in convictions for crimes committed upon incitement during undercover operation without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7118
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova
SARBAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 04/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: These cases primarily concern violations of the rights to liberty and security arising from: 1 Article 5 1: detention not based on reasonable suspicion Article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6712
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan
SARGSYAN v. Azerbaijan AZE 16/06/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: The case concerns a refugee of Armenian origin who was forced to flee from his home during the active military phase of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict 1992 94 . In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1717
SAVCA v. the Republic of Moldova
SAVCA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Poor material conditions of detention and overcrowding in Prison no. 13 amounting to degrading treatment and remand in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7130
SAVRAN v. Denmark
SAVRAN v. Denmark DNK 07/12/2021 00:00:00 10/12/2021 10:51:13 Case Description: The cases concern expulsion orders combined with permanent re entry bans following criminal convictions finally upheld during proceedings requesting revocation of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59071
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey
SAYGILI AND BILGIC v. Turkey TUR 20/08/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the closure of a newspaper for a period of 30 days which was erroneously considered to be the successor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37244
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey (no. 2)
SELAHATTIN DEMIRTAS v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 22/12/2020 00:00:00 18/01/2021 11:11:14 Case Description: The Selahattin Demirta No. 2 case concerns the arrest and pre trial detention of and criminal proceedings against the applicant a member of the National EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56539
SEVDARI v. Albania
SEVDARI v. Albania ALB 13/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the disproportionate dismissal following a vetting procedure re evaluation of the credentials of a prosecutor and a lifetime ban from re entering the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62937
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy
SHARIFI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 21/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: The case concerns the collective expulsion by Italy to Greece of four migrants intercepted as stowaways on ferries arriving in the port of Ancona between January EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15559
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania
SHARXHI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 28/05/2018 00:00:00 15/06/2018 15:30:46 Case Description: This case concerns the demolition in 2013 of a building in an Albanian coastal town in which the applicants owned flats and business premises in disregard of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49665
SHAW v. Hungary
SHAW v. Hungary HUN 26/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10523
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582