Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 201 - 220 of 454
KUMMER v. the Czech Republic
KUMMER v. the Czech Republic CZE 25/10/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Degrading treatment in police custody due to unjustified use of restraints lack of effective investigations thereof Status of Execution: The just satisfaction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6436
KUOPILA v. Finland
KUOPILA v. Finland FIN 27/07/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms on the ground that material submitted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4800
KURLOWICZ v. Poland
KURLOWICZ v. Poland POL 22/09/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of this group concern violations of the right to freedom of expression Article 10 due to the applicants politicians journalists or editors criminal conviction to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20608
KUSHNIR v. Ukraine
KUSHNIR v. Ukraine UKR 28/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of the right to a fair trial due to the domestic authorities failure to duly notify the applicants of court proceedings against them. Article 6 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56611
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L.B. v. Hungary
L.B. v. Hungary HUN 09/03/2023 00:00:00 20/03/2023 09:18:50 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of the publication of his taxpayer data in 2014 including his name and home EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62853
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LAGARDERE v. France
LAGARDERE v. France FRA 12/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings and infringement of the presumption of innocence due to a posthumous finding of guilt for abuse of social EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33063
LANZ v. Austria
LANZ v. Austria AUT 01/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to interference with defence rights in that contacts with the defence counsel during detention on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-779
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia
LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: The Lashmankin group mainly concerns violations of the right to freedom of assembly in different Russian cities between 2003 and 2018 violations of Article 11 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47097
LASZKIEWICZ v. Poland
LASZKIEWICZ v. Poland POL 15/04/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure equality of arms and the adversarial principle due to impossibility to adequately challenge motions for prolongation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18589
LAZOROSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
LAZOROSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 08/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unlawful detention in police custody without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6484
LE STUM v. France
LE STUM v. France FRA 04/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Legitimate doubts on the court s impartiality in proceedings against a bank manager for company management failures the court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33021
LEMO AND OTHERS v. Croatia
LEMO AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 10/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference due to domestic courts ordering to vacate flats owned by the state in breach of any procedural safeguards in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12041
LEMOINE v. France
LEMOINE v. France FRA 17/09/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court to contest a decision taken by his employer the French railway company discharging him from his post EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33109
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova
LEVINTA v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 16/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns mainly inhuman treatment or torture in police custody including with a view to extracting confessions lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7162
LIETZOW v. Germany
LIETZOW v. Germany DEU 13/02/2001 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings concerning the lawfulness of the applicant s detention on remand due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38310
LIGA PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL PROFISSIONAL v. Portugal
LIGA PORTUGUESA DE FUTEBOL PROFISSIONAL v. Portugal PRT 17/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings initially brought against the applicant association before the Lisbon Industrial Tribunal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39525
LIIVIK v. Estonia
LIIVIK v. Estonia EST 25/09/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:56:21 Case Description: No punishment without law: Conviction based on imprecise legislation which did not allow the applicant reasonably to foresee that his acts would be deemed to amount to causing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3087
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden SWE 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy in the context of protection of private and family life: Denial of locus standi in proceedings concerning the Tax Agency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47071