Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 128
A.M. v. France
A.M. v. France FRA 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability to contest the lawfulness of an alien s arrest and administrative detention pending enforcement of a deportation order as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39571
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ANEVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Bulgarian authorities to effectively pursue adequate and timely actions to enforce the first and third applicants custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47553
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 23/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Supreme Court s dismissal of the applicants amparo appeals concerning the calculation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51361
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BENEDIK v. Slovenia
BENEDIK v. Slovenia SVN 24/07/2018 00:00:00 23/10/2018 17:25:37 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Arbitrary interference by the police on the basis of a law lacking clarity and sufficient safeguards to obtain and use without a court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50585
BEREZA v. Ukraine
BEREZA v. Ukraine UKR 04/03/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Deprivation of liberty on account of the applicant s forcible escort to the police station by special force in order to be questioned as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56887
BERLIZEV v. Ukraine
BERLIZEV v. Ukraine UKR 08/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns covert recording of the applicants conversations without prior judicial authorisation in the course of criminal proceedings initiated in 2007 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58643
BIAO v. Denmark
BIAO v. Denmark DNK 24/05/2016 00:00:00 12/10/2016 18:12:08 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the applicants request for spousal reunification without compelling or weighty reasons in comparison to the more favourable conditions for family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17
BILEN AND CORUK v. Turkey
BILEN AND CORUK v. Turkey TUR 08/06/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and freedom of expression: Lack of a public hearing in criminal proceedings as well as unlawful interference due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37098
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova
BIMER S.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 10/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unlawful interference by a Customs Department order closing the applicant company duty free business located inside the Leu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6778
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
BORZHONOV v. Russia
BORZHONOV v. Russia RUS 22/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the authorities failure to respect the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions due to the retention of their property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13819
BOSTAN v. the Republic of Moldova
BOSTAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/03/2021 00:00:00 24/03/2021 15:15:14 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the search by the police of the applicant s home in the framework of contravention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57041
BOZZA v. Italy
BOZZA v. Italy ITA 14/12/2017 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure in the procedural context of the Pinto remedy to take the execution stage of proceedings into account when determining EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48591
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
BRUNCRONA v. Finland
BRUNCRONA v. Finland FIN 16/02/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the procedure adopted in terminating the applicants proprietary interest in certain islands i.e. by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4846