Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 321 - 340 of 492
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
NIEDBALA v. Poland
NIEDBALA v. Poland POL 04/07/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life: Detention on remand ordered by public prosecutor not offering sufficient guarantees of independence without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17773
NIKITIN AND OTHERS v. Estonia
NIKITIN AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Insufficient space during the applicants detention for various periods in Tallinn Prison and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52521
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
NURMAGOMEDOV v. Russia
NURMAGOMEDOV v. Russia RUS 07/09/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Right to individual petition: Interference due to the prison authorities refusal to forward a detainee s letter to the European Court. Article 34 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27628
NUSRET KAYA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
NUSRET KAYA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 08/09/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions imposed on the applicants telephone communications with their families EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37336
OJCZYK v. Poland
OJCZYK v. Poland POL 17/05/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / Conditions of detention: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to imprisonment in inadequate conditions particularly overcrowding and detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20582
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to handcuffing during in patient treatment of a detainee on remand in a disproportionate manner not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32266
OLAECHEA CAHUAS v. Spain
OLAECHEA CAHUAS v. Spain ESP 11/12/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Extradition despite risk of ill treatment: Failure to comply with an interim measure indicated by the Court under Rule 39 of the Rules of ECHR. Article 34 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3517
OLEKSA v. Poland
OLEKSA v. Poland POL 12/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: Conditions of detention / Protection against ill treatment: Inadequate prison conditions in in Mys owice Remand Centre and in Wojtkowice Prison. Article 3 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50017
OLEWNIK-CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. Poland
OLEWNIK CIEPLINSKA AND OLEWNIK v. Poland POL 05/12/2019 00:00:00 17/12/2019 16:24:16 Case Description: A series of failures by the police and prosecution service in dealing with the kidnapping of the applicants brother/son between 2001 and 2003 when he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54443
ONDER AND ZEYDAN v. Turkey
ONDER AND ZEYDAN v. Turkey TUR 02/11/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the lack of independence and impartiality of state security courts due to the presence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30232
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus CYP 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and against ill treatment: Disproportionate and unlawful interference due to the limitation of visiting rights and monitoring of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3201
OPREA v. Romania
OPREA v. Romania ROU 10/03/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Unlawful detention: Arrest by the border police and custody based on a warrant for the execution of a prison sentence which had been imposed in absentia and later revoked on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17570
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/01/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/ Conditions of detention: Structural problem of inadequate detention conditions particularly overcrowding aggravated by factors such as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39886
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to arbitrary monitoring of their correspondence during their detention due to shortcomings in the Prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43013
OTEGI MONDRAGON v. Spain
OTEGI MONDRAGON v. Spain ESP 15/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to a conviction of an elected representative and spokesperson of a parliamentary group to a one year prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5740
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
PACULA v. Latvia
PACULA v. Latvia LVA 15/12/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of correspondence: Conviction based on a witness statements without opportunity to question them at the hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31208