Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 193
HELLIG v. Germany
HELLIG v. Germany DEU 07/10/2011 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment due to detention in security cell for 7 days without clothing in the absence of sufficient reasons for such a deprivation. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38456
HIRST v. the United Kingdom
HIRST v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/10/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Excessive interval between the reviews concerning the applicants continued detention as discretionary life prisoners and absence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2600
HIRST v. the United Kingdom (no. 2)
HIRST v. the United Kingdom no. 2 GBR 06/10/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:16:22 Case Description: Electoral rights: General automatic and indiscriminate ban on convicted prisoners on voting in parliamentary elections. Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2204
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/06/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These two cases concern inhuman and degrading conditions of detention violations of Article 3 . In the Insanov case the applicant a former Minister of Health Care was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1801
IORDAN PETROV v. Bulgaria
IORDAN PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 24/04/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and conditions of detention: Stringent custodial regime combined with poor material conditions of detention and the lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1911
IORGOV v. Bulgaria
IORGOV v. Bulgaria BGR 07/07/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Conditions of detention and stringent custodial regime following the applicants sentence to death despite a moratorium on capital punishment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14315
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
JAEGER v. Estonia
JAEGER v. Estonia EST 31/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:41:35 Case Description: Violation of one s privacy in the course of a body search carried out in a stairwell in full view of other detainees Status of Execution: Special constructions in the Tartu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37436
JAKOBSKI v. Poland
JAKOBSKI v. Poland POL 07/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of religion: Refusal to provide a detainee with a meat free diet in conformity with the requirements of his Buddhist faith. Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18973
JAMES v. the United Kingdom
JAMES v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Arbitrary and unlawful detention of prisoners with indeterminate sentences for public protection IPP : after expiry of tariff periods failure to provide appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3011
JANKAUSKAS v. Lithuania
JANKAUSKAS v. Lithuania LTU 06/07/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the opening of correspondence of a remand prisoner by prison authorities. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4193
JASHI v. Georgia
JASHI v. Georgia GEO 08/04/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Care for mental problems in prison: failure to provide timely and adequate care in prison for the applicant s mental health problems Status of Execution: The applicant was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3371
JULIN v. Estonia
JULIN v. Estonia EST 29/08/2012 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:50:37 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment on account of confinement to a restraint bed in Tartu EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3043
KADIKIS v. Latvia
KADIKIS v. Latvia LVA 04/08/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Degrading treatment resulting from the conditions administrative detention in Liepaja State Police short term detention facility Jelgava EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31210
KAFKARIS v. Cyprus
KAFKARIS v. Cyprus CYP 12/02/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: No punishment without law: The law applicable at the time of the offence resulting in a conviction for murder was not sufficiently precise to enable the perpetrator to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2036
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KALDA v. Estonia
KALDA v. Estonia EST 06/06/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:50:37 Case Description: Protection of expression in particular the right to receive information: Disproportionate interference due to the prison authorities refusal to grant the applicant access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3051