Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 121 - 140 of 193
MONI v. Italy
MONI v. Italy ITA 11/01/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Disproportionate interference due to the monitoring of the applicant s correspondence in prison ordered by the judge responsible for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42623
MOUISEL v. France
MOUISEL v. France FRA 21/05/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Inhuman and /or degrading treatment of sick prisoners who in the Mouisel case had been kept in detention despite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33241
N.T. v. Russia
N.T. v. Russia RUS 16/11/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: Violation of the right not to be subject to ill treatment on account of application of the domestic law providing for automatic application of the prisons strict regime to all EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56305
NAYDYON v. Ukraine
NAYDYON v. Ukraine UKR 14/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to provide prisoners with effective access to the documents from their case files needed to substantiate their applications before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31118
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
NIEDBALA v. Poland
NIEDBALA v. Poland POL 04/07/2000 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and protection of private life: Detention on remand ordered by public prosecutor not offering sufficient guarantees of independence without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17773
NISIOTIS v. Greece
NISIOTIS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and/or degrading treatment of the applicants on account of the poor conditions of detention of the applicants in overcrowded prisons in Greece EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15760
NUSRET KAYA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
NUSRET KAYA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 08/09/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to restrictions imposed on the applicants telephone communications with their families EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37336
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine
OKHRIMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Inhuman and degrading treatment due to handcuffing during in patient treatment of a detainee on remand in a disproportionate manner not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32266
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus
ONOUFRIOU v. Cyprus CYP 07/04/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and against ill treatment: Disproportionate and unlawful interference due to the limitation of visiting rights and monitoring of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3201
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland
ORCHOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/01/2010 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/ Conditions of detention: Structural problem of inadequate detention conditions particularly overcrowding aggravated by factors such as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39886
OSHURKO v. Ukraine
OSHURKO v. Ukraine UKR 08/12/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Oshurko case concerns the authorities failure to meet their positive obligations to protect the physical integrity of a detainee in the ITT and to provide adequate and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31616
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy
OSPINA VARGAS v. Italy ITA 14/01/2005 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to arbitrary monitoring of their correspondence during their detention due to shortcomings in the Prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43013
PACULA v. Latvia
PACULA v. Latvia LVA 15/12/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of correspondence: Conviction based on a witness statements without opportunity to question them at the hearing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31208
PANTEA v. Romania
PANTEA v. Romania ROU 03/09/2003 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13075
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom
PAUL AND AUDREY EDWARDS v. the United Kingdom GBR 14/06/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protection the applicants son s life in detention on remand and lack of effective investigations into his violent death EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2628
PEERS v. Greece
PEERS v. Greece GRC 19/04/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / Conditions of detention in Korydallos men s prison and interference with correspondence. Articles 3 and 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22152
PETRA v. Romania
PETRA v. Romania ROU 23/09/1998 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private life / correspondence and the right to petition: Monitoring of the applicant s correspondence during his detention with the former European Commission of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15959
PETRESCU v. Portugal
PETRESCU v. Portugal PRT 03/03/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:43 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant due to overcrowding and poor material conditions in which he was detained during different periods EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54997
PETROV v. Bulgaria
PETROV v. Bulgaria BGR 22/08/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Disproportionate and discriminatory interference with private and family life and correspondence excessive length of criminal proceedings and lack of remedy: Unjustified EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14347